<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why So Serious? New &#8216;Fantastic Four&#8217; Photos &#038; Posters Are No Laughing Matter	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/why-so-serious-new-fantastic-four-photos-posters-are-no-laughing-matter-20150430/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/why-so-serious-new-fantastic-four-photos-posters-are-no-laughing-matter-20150430/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 03:33:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Emperor Zerg Rush		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/why-so-serious-new-fantastic-four-photos-posters-are-no-laughing-matter-20150430/#comment-131987</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emperor Zerg Rush]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 03:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2015/more/uncategorized/why-so-serious-new-fantastic-four-photos-posters-are-no-laughing-matter-264507/#comment-131987</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Changing Reed Richards\&#039; powers to that he &#034;warps time and space&#034; turns him into something opposite of Mr. Fantastic. The only person on that poster that doesn\&#039;t look ridiculous or out of place due to crummy editing is Michael B. Jordan. Also, not all superhero film posters suffer from being absolute trash. Most do, but there ARE rare exceptions. I still stand by my assessment that this won\&#039;t be a flop (though I secretly hope it will) and that Trank is better off directing for DC, while Marvel should be handed back the rights to its first family to do a film that captures the right tone for the material. A Nolan-ized take on the Fantastic Four is not a film I\&#039;ll pay to see. A Chronicle sequel, maybe. A Trank directed Green Lantern film, possibly. But not this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Changing Reed Richards\&#8217; powers to that he &quot;warps time and space&quot; turns him into something opposite of Mr. Fantastic. The only person on that poster that doesn\&#8217;t look ridiculous or out of place due to crummy editing is Michael B. Jordan. Also, not all superhero film posters suffer from being absolute trash. Most do, but there ARE rare exceptions. I still stand by my assessment that this won\&#8217;t be a flop (though I secretly hope it will) and that Trank is better off directing for DC, while Marvel should be handed back the rights to its first family to do a film that captures the right tone for the material. A Nolan-ized take on the Fantastic Four is not a film I\&#8217;ll pay to see. A Chronicle sequel, maybe. A Trank directed Green Lantern film, possibly. But not this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
