<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Wes Craven Thought Unanimously Panned &#8216;Titans&#8217; 3D-Conversion Was &#8220;Beautiful&#8221;; Says New &#8216;Scream&#8217; Films Are Trilogy Only If They Perform Well	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/wes-craven-thought-unanimously-panned-20101010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/wes-craven-thought-unanimously-panned-20101010/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2020 02:01:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Matt Richardson		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/wes-craven-thought-unanimously-panned-20101010/#comment-24682</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Richardson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=621#comment-24682</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[scream made for $14mill made $173.&lt;br /&gt;scream 2 made for $24mill made $172.&lt;br /&gt;scream 3 made for $40mill made $163.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It was not a devastating downturn but the figures show a decline, so &#039;disappointing&#039; I thought was accurate. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After all, when Scream 3 came out it was an established franchise, compared with the unknown original, scream 3 initially produced a 23% or $36mill less return at box-office from the original investment made by the studio.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>scream made for $14mill made $173.<br />scream 2 made for $24mill made $172.<br />scream 3 made for $40mill made $163.</p>
<p>It was not a devastating downturn but the figures show a decline, so &#39;disappointing&#39; I thought was accurate. </p>
<p>After all, when Scream 3 came out it was an established franchise, compared with the unknown original, scream 3 initially produced a 23% or $36mill less return at box-office from the original investment made by the studio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kevin		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/wes-craven-thought-unanimously-panned-20101010/#comment-24351</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 02:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=621#comment-24351</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Scream 3 made $89,143,175 domestic and $72,691,101 overseas giving it a cume of $161,834,276 worldwide.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;d hardley consider that disappointing.  It&#039;s also about $10M less than the original&#039;s tally.  That&#039;s a remarkably successful franchise, but however you&#039;d like to spin it....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scream 3 made $89,143,175 domestic and $72,691,101 overseas giving it a cume of $161,834,276 worldwide.</p>
<p>I&#39;d hardley consider that disappointing.  It&#39;s also about $10M less than the original&#39;s tally.  That&#39;s a remarkably successful franchise, but however you&#39;d like to spin it&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
