Women didn\’t go see it because it was another underwear movie. Female audiences do not want to see women through the distorted vision of male eyes and the underwear limited male imagination. Why doesn\’t Hollywood hold a writing contest for young girls where they can write their own empowerment. If you can see clear to remove the male requirement that everything happen while the females wear only underwear you would get some sell-able stories. This movie was a derivative sexist POS. Please could male film makers stop the lingerie empowerment campaign and give young women the empowerment to tell their own stories. Or maybe you like losing money.

I don\’t like when Playlist acts like AICN and denies basic reality just cause they either liked the movie or have some weird, unknown personal stake in its success. This site pimped Paul forever, and it was a bomb, just accept it. No one cares about Simon Pegg or Nick Frost in America, only geeks and fanboys, and as we saw with Sucker Punch, they are a meaningless demographic that will do nothing for your movie.

I\’m glad that a CGI Convention without any compelling story didn\’t get the thumbs up from audiences.

I dont\’ think Diary of a Wimpy Kid will stick in anyone\’s minds, executives too, long enough to take room in the pipelines from imaginative ideas.
For example, Limitless (even if not that great) has much more going for it than Sucker Punch.
Huge robots and CGI action targeted at girls? No way, WB. Nice try attempting to \”flip the script\”.

$80 million for Sucker Punch is not Zack Snyder\’s fault, it\’s WB\’s. But they have the Harry Potter Endowment Fund to spend at will.
But who can say what Zack Snyder will do with Superman. At this point, I couldn\’t care less about the movie.