<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Watch: Video Essay Details How Andrei Tarkovsky’s &#8216;Solaris&#8217; Is A Response To Stanley Kubrick&#8217;s &#8216;2001: A Space Odyssey&#8217;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/watch-video-essay-details-how-andrei-tarkovskys-solaris-is-a-response-to-stanley-kubricks-2001-a-space-odyssey-20150811/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/watch-video-essay-details-how-andrei-tarkovskys-solaris-is-a-response-to-stanley-kubricks-2001-a-space-odyssey-20150811/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 02:41:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Daniel		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/watch-video-essay-details-how-andrei-tarkovskys-solaris-is-a-response-to-stanley-kubricks-2001-a-space-odyssey-20150811/#comment-126979</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 02:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2015/more/uncategorized/watch-video-essay-details-how-andrei-tarkovskys-solaris-is-a-response-to-stanley-kubricks-2001-a-space-odyssey-260934/#comment-126979</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The purpose of 2001\&#039;s clean, empty technology is to show how dead we are to actual wonder, not to celebrate it. I love Tarkovsky, but his is a total misread of what Kubrick is saying, i believe. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The purpose of 2001\&#8217;s clean, empty technology is to show how dead we are to actual wonder, not to celebrate it. I love Tarkovsky, but his is a total misread of what Kubrick is saying, i believe. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
