<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Watch: First Footage From James Toback &#038; Alec Baldwin&#8217;s Cannes Documentary &#8216;Seduced &#038; Abandoned&#8217;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/watch-first-footage-from-james-toback-alec-baldwins-cannes-documentary-seduced-abandoned-20130516/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/watch-first-footage-from-james-toback-alec-baldwins-cannes-documentary-seduced-abandoned-20130516/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 09:55:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Glenn Jacobson		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/watch-first-footage-from-james-toback-alec-baldwins-cannes-documentary-seduced-abandoned-20130516/#comment-54883</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn Jacobson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 09:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/watch-first-footage-from-james-toback-alec-baldwins-cannes-documentary-seduced-abandoned-98074/#comment-54883</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I do not understand, as I observe these reknown filmmakers discussing the difficulties of securing finance. Sure, it&#x27;s not easy, but it seems a bit ludicrous that they don&#x27;t resort to dipping into their own coffers. Knowing that they&#x27;ve been very successful with past films, it seems they could skip the process of looking for money. Sure, it would appeal to use someone else&#x27;s funds if possible, but they need to check their own bank accounts and do a little skimming  off the top if their hearts are truly into getting their project &#x27;in the canne&#x27;, so to speak. The supreme of artists, Orson Welles, did just that. They seem to be like that guy we all know who always has   a hard time getting his hand in and out of his pocket when it is time for a restaurant tab to be paid.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not understand, as I observe these reknown filmmakers discussing the difficulties of securing finance. Sure, it&#x27;s not easy, but it seems a bit ludicrous that they don&#x27;t resort to dipping into their own coffers. Knowing that they&#x27;ve been very successful with past films, it seems they could skip the process of looking for money. Sure, it would appeal to use someone else&#x27;s funds if possible, but they need to check their own bank accounts and do a little skimming  off the top if their hearts are truly into getting their project &#x27;in the canne&#x27;, so to speak. The supreme of artists, Orson Welles, did just that. They seem to be like that guy we all know who always has   a hard time getting his hand in and out of his pocket when it is time for a restaurant tab to be paid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
