Comments on: Watch: 8-Minute Analysis Of Christopher Nolan’s ‘Inception’ Digs Into The Mystery

By: greg

greg — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:16:47 +0000

problem about all these theories are forgetting the most obvious thing.. the story telling.. and cobbs goal is to go back home with his kids and his conflict is his obsession with dream vs reality (same goes with audience) thats why he got stuck in it for a long time (same goes to audiences who keeps analyzing the details) but in the end what is important is his back with his kid…. thats the real story reality vs dream is an important in the end as cobb have let go of it while the audience till now are still stuck with the obsession that stopped cobb from achieving his ultimate desire at 1st.. and thats the most obvious thing . to go back home to his kids…analyzation of dream vs reality is the full proof of the unecessary obssesion that cobb had when just likw what his father said "you know you can come back home anytime". making this analyzation another waste of time.

By: Xavier

Xavier — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:16:47 +0000

I have the craziest theory of all, that Nolan meant for it to be open ended so that he didn't have to commit either way and any tiny hints you can find one way or another are accidental. The movie is just not as deep as people want to think (its a pretty fun sci fi ride though) and "analysts" have put way more time, thought and effort into it than the writers ever did (again not to say that overall, its bad writing).

By: Zach

Zach — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:16:47 +0000

very interesting! I personally took the ending as a dream (let's call it an emotional interpretation) but I agree it doesn't really matter.