<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Warm &#8216;Quantum Of Solace&#8217; Reviews Suggest Bond Has The Goods Once Again; Lame Title Hasn&#8217;t Ruined It For Anyone	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/warm-quantum-of-solace-reviews-sugges-20081021/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/warm-quantum-of-solace-reviews-sugges-20081021/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2020 17:00:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: cirkusfolk		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/warm-quantum-of-solace-reviews-sugges-20081021/#comment-2299</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cirkusfolk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 04:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=9744#comment-2299</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wow, i expected you guys to report on this film&#039;s test screenings, but in the other way.  I read a negative review courtesy of aintitcoolnews that i normally wouldn&#039;t put alot of faith in, but for some reason i can forsee what the reviewer says to be a serious make or break the film problem.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&quot;No, the issues are with the studio&#039;s choice of director in Marc&lt;BR/&gt;Forster. This is a man who knows how to put dramatic audiences through&lt;BR/&gt;the wringer (Monster&#039;s Ball, Finding Neverland, The Kite Runner) but&lt;BR/&gt;he&#039;s completely out of his depth handling a franchise this large.&lt;BR/&gt;High-tempo sequences, like the opening car chase and an extremely&lt;BR/&gt;Bournian rooftop pursuit, are disorientating in the extreme: too fast,&lt;BR/&gt;too sloppy and too ruthlessly edited. Often, things change in the&lt;BR/&gt;blink of an eye – one second Bond is lying on his back, the next he&#039;s&lt;BR/&gt;jumping out a window, the next he&#039;s swinging from a rope. It&#039;s often&lt;BR/&gt;impossible to keep up.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Fight scenes often seem practised and stagey (Bond smashes an opponent&lt;BR/&gt;through a wall with ridiculous ease), while one shot sees 007 riding a&lt;BR/&gt;motorbike... at about 25mph. These are all hallmarks of a director&lt;BR/&gt;unfamiliar with action; perhaps former Paul Greengrass protege Dan&lt;BR/&gt;Bradley should be held responsible (it would certainly explain the&lt;BR/&gt;feeling of deja vu – as Bond jumps through yet another window, you may&lt;BR/&gt;feel like yelling, Alan Partridge style, &quot;STOP GETTING BOURNE&lt;BR/&gt;WRONG!&quot;).&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;What&#039;s more, the realistic tone struck by Martin Campbell in Casino&lt;BR/&gt;Royale has taken something of a leave of absence here. MI6 use flashy,&lt;BR/&gt;over-the-top Minority Report-style holo-computers, when anyone who&lt;BR/&gt;reads the papers knows that British intelligence can&#039;t even hop in a&lt;BR/&gt;taxi without leaving their laptop in the back. Bond, leaping on a bad&lt;BR/&gt;guy&#039;s bonnet, finds time to fire of a clunky quip before his bullet.&lt;BR/&gt;Amalric&#039;s bad guy lurches uncomfortably from believably slimy to&lt;BR/&gt;ridiculously evil, lunging at Bond with an axe in a final showdown.&lt;BR/&gt;Though I hesitate to compare it to Indy&#039;s infamous &#039;fridge&#039; escape,&lt;BR/&gt;the scene where 007 jumps out of a plane without a parachute /and&lt;BR/&gt;survives/ seems a little too far-fetched even for a Bond movie. All we&lt;BR/&gt;ask is for some consistency – this isn&#039;t Crank, this is Bond.&quot;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Being an action stickler, this isn&#039;t good news, and reminds me of all the talk about Chris Nolan not being able to direct action.  And although i loved the Dark Knight, there were action scenes in it that really didn&#039;t flow.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, i expected you guys to report on this film&#8217;s test screenings, but in the other way.  I read a negative review courtesy of aintitcoolnews that i normally wouldn&#8217;t put alot of faith in, but for some reason i can forsee what the reviewer says to be a serious make or break the film problem.</p>
<p>&#8220;No, the issues are with the studio&#8217;s choice of director in Marc<br />Forster. This is a man who knows how to put dramatic audiences through<br />the wringer (Monster&#8217;s Ball, Finding Neverland, The Kite Runner) but<br />he&#8217;s completely out of his depth handling a franchise this large.<br />High-tempo sequences, like the opening car chase and an extremely<br />Bournian rooftop pursuit, are disorientating in the extreme: too fast,<br />too sloppy and too ruthlessly edited. Often, things change in the<br />blink of an eye – one second Bond is lying on his back, the next he&#8217;s<br />jumping out a window, the next he&#8217;s swinging from a rope. It&#8217;s often<br />impossible to keep up.</p>
<p>Fight scenes often seem practised and stagey (Bond smashes an opponent<br />through a wall with ridiculous ease), while one shot sees 007 riding a<br />motorbike&#8230; at about 25mph. These are all hallmarks of a director<br />unfamiliar with action; perhaps former Paul Greengrass protege Dan<br />Bradley should be held responsible (it would certainly explain the<br />feeling of deja vu – as Bond jumps through yet another window, you may<br />feel like yelling, Alan Partridge style, &#8220;STOP GETTING BOURNE<br />WRONG!&#8221;).</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more, the realistic tone struck by Martin Campbell in Casino<br />Royale has taken something of a leave of absence here. MI6 use flashy,<br />over-the-top Minority Report-style holo-computers, when anyone who<br />reads the papers knows that British intelligence can&#8217;t even hop in a<br />taxi without leaving their laptop in the back. Bond, leaping on a bad<br />guy&#8217;s bonnet, finds time to fire of a clunky quip before his bullet.<br />Amalric&#8217;s bad guy lurches uncomfortably from believably slimy to<br />ridiculously evil, lunging at Bond with an axe in a final showdown.<br />Though I hesitate to compare it to Indy&#8217;s infamous &#8216;fridge&#8217; escape,<br />the scene where 007 jumps out of a plane without a parachute /and<br />survives/ seems a little too far-fetched even for a Bond movie. All we<br />ask is for some consistency – this isn&#8217;t Crank, this is Bond.&#8221;</p>
<p>Being an action stickler, this isn&#8217;t good news, and reminds me of all the talk about Chris Nolan not being able to direct action.  And although i loved the Dark Knight, there were action scenes in it that really didn&#8217;t flow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bob		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/warm-quantum-of-solace-reviews-sugges-20081021/#comment-2298</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 01:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=9744#comment-2298</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[NICE!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NICE!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
