<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8216;Twilight: Eclipse&#8217; Makes Back Its $68 Million Budget In One Day	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/twilight-eclipse-makes-back-its-68-20100702/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/twilight-eclipse-makes-back-its-68-20100702/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:01:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/twilight-eclipse-makes-back-its-68-20100702/#comment-20669</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 03:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=2383#comment-20669</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not so sure I would give Summit &#034;props&#034; for keeping their budgets so low. Fans should be disgusted they are being so badly ripped off with poor production values and laughable FX on top of a movie that was obviously very fast tracked (to its disadvantage) so as to capitalize on the phenomenon. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is one of the main differences between a very good franchise, like Harry Potter, and a overly shitty one, like Twilight. Potter keeps pumping more money into subsequent films in an attempt to always improve and give a quality product, which they undoubtedly deliver on at least from a production value standpoint. Summit could easily afford to increase these budgets for such a sure bet franchise, yet they continue to rape it for all its worth and royally screw their fans... in the ass... not to mention fueling the fire on the whole backlash front with the resulting turd sandwich of a movie.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m not so sure I would give Summit &quot;props&quot; for keeping their budgets so low. Fans should be disgusted they are being so badly ripped off with poor production values and laughable FX on top of a movie that was obviously very fast tracked (to its disadvantage) so as to capitalize on the phenomenon. </p>
<p>This is one of the main differences between a very good franchise, like Harry Potter, and a overly shitty one, like Twilight. Potter keeps pumping more money into subsequent films in an attempt to always improve and give a quality product, which they undoubtedly deliver on at least from a production value standpoint. Summit could easily afford to increase these budgets for such a sure bet franchise, yet they continue to rape it for all its worth and royally screw their fans&#8230; in the ass&#8230; not to mention fueling the fire on the whole backlash front with the resulting turd sandwich of a movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Frank Steiner		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/twilight-eclipse-makes-back-its-68-20100702/#comment-20660</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Steiner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 23:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=2383#comment-20660</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You guys do understand that a studio/distributor doesn&#039;t get back 100% of the box office gross, right?  The concept of &#034;making as much as its budget&#034; is a meaningless one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys do understand that a studio/distributor doesn&#39;t get back 100% of the box office gross, right?  The concept of &quot;making as much as its budget&quot; is a meaningless one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: goldfarb		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/twilight-eclipse-makes-back-its-68-20100702/#comment-20655</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[goldfarb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 20:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=2383#comment-20655</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[but what were the marketing costs of Eclipse? I&#039;m not suggesting that the total would reach that of air bender...but apples to apples please.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but what were the marketing costs of Eclipse? I&#39;m not suggesting that the total would reach that of air bender&#8230;but apples to apples please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Barry Lyndon		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/twilight-eclipse-makes-back-its-68-20100702/#comment-20654</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry Lyndon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 20:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=2383#comment-20654</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[RAGE!!!!!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RAGE!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
