https://staging2.theplaylist.net/tribeca-review-tom-tykwers-a-hologram-for-the-king-starring-tom-hanks-20160419/ Wed, 31 Aug 2016 02:37:23 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.5 https://staging2.theplaylist.net/tribeca-review-tom-tykwers-a-hologram-for-the-king-starring-tom-hanks-20160419/#comment-147999 Wed, 20 Apr 2016 04:55:57 +0000 http://www.indiewire.com/2016/more/uncategorized/tribeca-review-tom-tykwers-a-hologram-for-the-king-starring-tom-hanks-292390/#comment-147999 Yes, "double standards" do exist, Martha. I don\’t think it would be possible to review every new film in relation to every single other film in the calendar year. Unless you are implying that every film needs to be judged in relation to BvS specifically, which would be an even stranger argument.

]]> https://staging2.theplaylist.net/tribeca-review-tom-tykwers-a-hologram-for-the-king-starring-tom-hanks-20160419/#comment-148000 Wed, 20 Apr 2016 01:51:58 +0000 http://www.indiewire.com/2016/more/uncategorized/tribeca-review-tom-tykwers-a-hologram-for-the-king-starring-tom-hanks-292390/#comment-148000 Really Martha? You want the website to do deep, thorough essays on every single film that comes out throughout the year? Do you really not see the difference between a mid-budget Tom Hanks drama and a massive, gargantuan budgeted film that was expected to make a billion dollars and kick start an entirely new franchise for WB? Why might one spark more conversation than the other, I wonder?

]]> https://staging2.theplaylist.net/tribeca-review-tom-tykwers-a-hologram-for-the-king-starring-tom-hanks-20160419/#comment-148001 Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:34:24 +0000 http://www.indiewire.com/2016/more/uncategorized/tribeca-review-tom-tykwers-a-hologram-for-the-king-starring-tom-hanks-292390/#comment-148001 See. For s h i t movies like this, you don\’t snap and write essays. You guys will still call Tykwer an auteur. Then why have double standards for Znyder and BvS?

]]>