Editing could only do so much. You could tell the story much much much faster but still. nothing happens. "There are three types of scenes in this film, alternating between each other like a nightmarish merry-go-round." there for. a shorter edit wouldn't help this issue, but at least the word excruciating doesn't open the review. :/ But BLAH is right. it all starts with a good WRITER not an actor… Whomever the HACK is that called the shots on the final edit should should be brought to the front with the negativity.

Your post plays like a self-serving and contrived, albeit very well written, press release for Jolly. It's actually 'preposerous and shameful' that the Jolly team didn't put this type of focus and planning into the production, such as pinning down SPECIFICS of filmmaking. For example, tempo-rhythm. (Jolly flatlines.) How about rising action and mounting obstacles for the characters to overcome while in pursuit of objectives. (no rising action for 2nd half of film.) How 'bout provocative ideas and questions that the film leaves in the minds of the audience? hmm. In order to be Hollywood's next hot young team, you really have to have more to offer than press releases and a huge sense of entitlement. You have got to put in the work.

But just in case he doesn't, I was the guy who always wore really cool matching tennis outfits on set every day. and it was my parents who fronted me the cash so I could be exec producer on the film. Oscar remembers me.

the critics shat all over Supertroopers too and it only made it that much funnier

2012 best stoner cult film: jolly