<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Tom Cruise Action Vehicle &#8216;One Shot&#8217; Retitled To Franchise Ready &#8216;Jack Reacher&#8217;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/tom-cruise-action-vehicle-one-shot-retitled-to-franchise-ready-jack-reacher-20120529/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/tom-cruise-action-vehicle-one-shot-retitled-to-franchise-ready-jack-reacher-20120529/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:23:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: DB		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/tom-cruise-action-vehicle-one-shot-retitled-to-franchise-ready-jack-reacher-20120529/#comment-77502</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/tom-cruise-action-vehicle-one-shot-retitled-to-franchise-ready-jack-reacher-110188/#comment-77502</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I saw the free preview in Burbank last week. It was one of those &#034;untitled movie&#034; previews where you don&#x27;t know going in what the film was going to be. The line wrapped half way around the theater two hours before they let us in, because most if us thought it was going to be The Amazing Spider-Man, or Total Recall.

When the douchebag announcer said &#034;you&#x27;re about to be the first audience in the world see...&#034; people started cheering. Then he said &#034;Jack Reacher, starring Tom Cruise&#034; and the giant auditorium fell silent. You could&#x27;ve heard a pin drop on a cushion. Then as he continued talking, I heard (and said) &#034;What the f--- is Jack Reacher?!&#034; people were mocking the name, someone said &#034;two hours for this Tom cruise shit?!&#034; The general mood of the room wasn&#x27;t just uninterested, it was antagonistic. I looked around. I saw a lot of faces that seemed as angry and disappointed as mine must have been.

It&#x27;s important to note all that, for context.

Because as soon as the film started, it won the room over. The opening shot (pun intended) was something Hitchcock would have done in his prime. Aside from a 3-4 minute scene that seemed too expository toward the beginning, the movie was well paced, well acted, suspenseful, the action was tense and realistic (you could almost feel how much punching another human being hurts both the punchee and the puncher, and Cruise showed a lot of vulnerability even in those action scenes. One of the most viscerally violent action scenes was also the funniest bit of comic relief in the film. And for that matter, the humor was unexpected and brilliantly executed.

In the end, People seemed satisfied. I sure was. I was glad it was this film instead of Spider-Man, because sad to say, there&#x27;s no way I would&#x27;ve chosen to pay money to see Tom Cruise in a film called &#034;Jack Reacher.&#034;

I hope that title doesn&#x27;t dissuade moviegoers, because after seeig that, I want to see sequels.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the free preview in Burbank last week. It was one of those &quot;untitled movie&quot; previews where you don&#x27;t know going in what the film was going to be. The line wrapped half way around the theater two hours before they let us in, because most if us thought it was going to be The Amazing Spider-Man, or Total Recall.</p>
<p>When the douchebag announcer said &quot;you&#x27;re about to be the first audience in the world see&#8230;&quot; people started cheering. Then he said &quot;Jack Reacher, starring Tom Cruise&quot; and the giant auditorium fell silent. You could&#x27;ve heard a pin drop on a cushion. Then as he continued talking, I heard (and said) &quot;What the f&#8212; is Jack Reacher?!&quot; people were mocking the name, someone said &quot;two hours for this Tom cruise shit?!&quot; The general mood of the room wasn&#x27;t just uninterested, it was antagonistic. I looked around. I saw a lot of faces that seemed as angry and disappointed as mine must have been.</p>
<p>It&#x27;s important to note all that, for context.</p>
<p>Because as soon as the film started, it won the room over. The opening shot (pun intended) was something Hitchcock would have done in his prime. Aside from a 3-4 minute scene that seemed too expository toward the beginning, the movie was well paced, well acted, suspenseful, the action was tense and realistic (you could almost feel how much punching another human being hurts both the punchee and the puncher, and Cruise showed a lot of vulnerability even in those action scenes. One of the most viscerally violent action scenes was also the funniest bit of comic relief in the film. And for that matter, the humor was unexpected and brilliantly executed.</p>
<p>In the end, People seemed satisfied. I sure was. I was glad it was this film instead of Spider-Man, because sad to say, there&#x27;s no way I would&#x27;ve chosen to pay money to see Tom Cruise in a film called &quot;Jack Reacher.&quot;</p>
<p>I hope that title doesn&#x27;t dissuade moviegoers, because after seeig that, I want to see sequels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PapushiSun		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/tom-cruise-action-vehicle-one-shot-retitled-to-franchise-ready-jack-reacher-20120529/#comment-77503</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PapushiSun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/tom-cruise-action-vehicle-one-shot-retitled-to-franchise-ready-jack-reacher-110188/#comment-77503</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hey remember how they renamed a certain film John Carter and how well that worked out?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey remember how they renamed a certain film John Carter and how well that worked out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: wow		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/tom-cruise-action-vehicle-one-shot-retitled-to-franchise-ready-jack-reacher-20120529/#comment-77504</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/tom-cruise-action-vehicle-one-shot-retitled-to-franchise-ready-jack-reacher-110188/#comment-77504</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[lol his buddies at blogs were complaining about other movie be violent and someone mentiond the one shot title is for killing and then this comes too quick. lol]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol his buddies at blogs were complaining about other movie be violent and someone mentiond the one shot title is for killing and then this comes too quick. lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mr Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/tom-cruise-action-vehicle-one-shot-retitled-to-franchise-ready-jack-reacher-20120529/#comment-77505</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/tom-cruise-action-vehicle-one-shot-retitled-to-franchise-ready-jack-reacher-110188/#comment-77505</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Apparently the film has had test screenings and been testing well. What they learnt wasn&#x27;t testing well was the actual title of the movie &#x27;One Shot&#x27; (said it was too vague) so they changed it to Jack Reacher hence Tom Cruise IS Jack Reacher.

PS. When will The Playlist&#x27;s review of Prometheus be up?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently the film has had test screenings and been testing well. What they learnt wasn&#x27;t testing well was the actual title of the movie &#x27;One Shot&#x27; (said it was too vague) so they changed it to Jack Reacher hence Tom Cruise IS Jack Reacher.</p>
<p>PS. When will The Playlist&#x27;s review of Prometheus be up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim Tushinski		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/tom-cruise-action-vehicle-one-shot-retitled-to-franchise-ready-jack-reacher-20120529/#comment-77506</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Tushinski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/tom-cruise-action-vehicle-one-shot-retitled-to-franchise-ready-jack-reacher-110188/#comment-77506</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Never heard of Jack Reacher or the books so the title sounds rather banal and stupid to me. But then again, Tom Cruise in any film (unless it&#x27;s directed by P.T. Anderson or Stanley Kubrick or someone of that stature) is an automatic NO WAY for me, stupid title or not. He long ago joined the ranks of Jim Carrey and Mel Gibson as performers I avoid at all costs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never heard of Jack Reacher or the books so the title sounds rather banal and stupid to me. But then again, Tom Cruise in any film (unless it&#x27;s directed by P.T. Anderson or Stanley Kubrick or someone of that stature) is an automatic NO WAY for me, stupid title or not. He long ago joined the ranks of Jim Carrey and Mel Gibson as performers I avoid at all costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ben		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/tom-cruise-action-vehicle-one-shot-retitled-to-franchise-ready-jack-reacher-20120529/#comment-77507</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/tom-cruise-action-vehicle-one-shot-retitled-to-franchise-ready-jack-reacher-110188/#comment-77507</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#x27;t get why they always do this. Why would I go see a movie called Jack Reacher?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#x27;t get why they always do this. Why would I go see a movie called Jack Reacher?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: bunty		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/tom-cruise-action-vehicle-one-shot-retitled-to-franchise-ready-jack-reacher-20120529/#comment-77508</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bunty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/tom-cruise-action-vehicle-one-shot-retitled-to-franchise-ready-jack-reacher-110188/#comment-77508</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Let the &#034;Reacher Round&#034; jokes begin!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let the &quot;Reacher Round&quot; jokes begin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom C		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/tom-cruise-action-vehicle-one-shot-retitled-to-franchise-ready-jack-reacher-20120529/#comment-77509</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/tom-cruise-action-vehicle-one-shot-retitled-to-franchise-ready-jack-reacher-110188/#comment-77509</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[At least it&#x27;s a better than JOHN CARTER.  Doesn&#x27;t hurt that Tom Cruise will sell a hell of a lot more tickets than Taylor Kitsch ever could.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least it&#x27;s a better than JOHN CARTER.  Doesn&#x27;t hurt that Tom Cruise will sell a hell of a lot more tickets than Taylor Kitsch ever could.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
