Comments on: Todd Phillips Says A ‘Hangover Part 3’ Is Being Planned & 17 More Things Learned From ‘Part II’

By: Susana

Susana — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:28:38 +0000

hangover 3 should be done in Amsterdam that would be insane.

I like the first one better than the 2nd Mr. Chow was my favorite in the 1st and 2nd he definitely should come back for the 3rd installment. He made the movie …

Its hard to make sequels that need to live up to the first. I think that it could of been funnier. It was okay. the first to me was my favorite and funniest movie of all time personal opinion.

It my comments are ever read just know that the 3rd should be done like I stated in AMSTERDAM with the red light district the free marijane and of course with Mr. Chow oh this would be insanley funny.

By: jarrod

jarrod — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:28:38 +0000

it looks cool

By: Mason

Mason — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:28:38 +0000

the hangover part 3 should be about Alan getting married because part 1 was about doug getting married and part 2 was about Stu getting married and Phil is married so it should be about Alan getting married

By: christian

christian — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:28:38 +0000

just make a hangover 3 please!!!!! FAST

By: Dorian Stokely

Dorian Stokely — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:28:38 +0000

I have a disturbingly hard time with what critics\’re saying about The Hangover 2. Lets get a few things straight.
1)There\’re way too many critics saying that Pt 2\’s filled with \”gross-out humor\” and parts that\’re for pure \”shock value\”. What shock value? Penises? You\’re kidding right? They act as if it\’s the first movie to brave full frontal nudity. Have they not seen Observe And Report, Sex Drive, Scary Movie and Forgetting Sarah Marshall? And to go back a little oldskool, how \’bout Boogie Nights and Any Given Sunday. And when it comes to female nudity, please. It\’s not a comedy if there\’re no tits.
2)Gross-out humor? What was gross-out? Ohhh. Ed Helms\’ character getting backdoored by a transgendered hooker? I hate to pull out a trump card here, but isn\’t that just a tad homophobic? And if that\’s not the gross-out humor, what is? I doubt I missed anything seeing it multiple times on a 50-foot screen.
3)This is my biggest issue. People, critics especially, are disdainfully unimpressed by the plot. Listen, guys. What did you expect? The fact that it\’s the same template in that they lose someone and can\’t remember what happened makes it funny. What else do you want to see? That\’s EXACTLY what makes it as funny as it is. The fact that all those things happen again. Having said that, that\’s the only thing remotely similar besides Stu, again, being the one to figure out what happened just before Phil confesses their scandalous trysts. I can\’t say enough about how different Pt 2 is. Just because they\’re drugged again and just because they lose someone by no means should be considered anything like the first. Actually, in Pt 2, the lost person loses himself. HE goes up an elevator to get more ice and the power dies. In the first one, they intentionally bring Doug to the top of the hotel as a prank. Anyone who says it\’s \”just like\” the first one or has \”nothing new\”, honestly, is jaded and has no sense nor appreciation of this or any legendary or future legendary movie.
4)I also read, before I saw the movie, that the monkey has an \”unhealthy obsession\” with touching human genitals. Really? After seeing the movie, I was actually angry because of all these stupid reviews that make absolutely no sense.
5)Just in general, people. Anyone who sees this movie and says the things I mentioned before are completely jaded and aren\’t satisfied with anything. And it seems to me that all critics are so obsessed with dramas and dramatic movies that they\’re literally incapable of unbiased opinions. It\’s like if it\’s not a deep family drama or a western, it\’s grossly underappreciated.
I cannot stress enough how stupid you are if you maintain that the reason you don\’t like Pt 2 is because it\’s the same as one. You\’re beyond dumb, ridiculous, stupid, mentally incompetent and wouldn\’t know a good movie if it went down on you if you. That\’s just reality. This is, by far, one of the best sequels ever made in cinema history and will be remembered. Partly because it\’s brilliant and partly because, well, it\’s the highest grossing comedy of all time. Ladies and gentlemen, meet film perfection. Their names are Bradley Cooper, Ed Helms, Zach Galifianakis, Ken Jeong and Todd Phillips. The 2000\’s Wolfpack to 1980\’s Brat Pack. Some of the decades best comedic pairings.
So, if you haven\’t seen this movie yet or\’ve been told by people that it\’s not good, don\’t believe a word until you see it for yourself. It\’s worth every penny.

By: Ashley

Ashley — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:28:38 +0000

Yeah i looked for him too! I\’m super bummed if he really just isnt in it. His cameo in the beginning of Old School was the best! And that was him trying to lick the blonde\’s feet on the bus, but it was in Road Trip actually, not Rat Race.

By: ritch

ritch — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:28:38 +0000

Todd Phillips was in Rat Race I think. When the blonde girl is on the bus and he is wanting to lick her toe? I am sure that is him

By: corlon

corlon — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:28:38 +0000

does anyone know which scene \”Mr. Creepy\” aka Todd Phillips is in? he\’s credited on imdb, but couldn\’t find him in the flick. seen it twice already.

By: Ian

Ian — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:28:38 +0000

a suggestion for part 3: Rio, Carnival time, the way to go, maybe this can top Thailand, just maybe

By: Steve

Steve — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:28:38 +0000

When they do Hangover 3, it would be interesting to see it done in Mexico or Rio, but from Phillips\’ comment, it may involve the Olympics in some way or form (unless he\’s joking of course), which can be a great spin on the series.

Taking into consideration how by-the-numbers the sequel was plot-wise compared to the first, the fact that Phillips is saying (or not, could be joking again, idk) the third will be a different movie entirely is a relief.

That said, a third movie involving Rio de Janiero for the 2016 Olympics could be pretty damn good – the Brazillian government needs tourists now more than ever and can use the attention, and there is honestly no way they can film the movie in time for the London Olympics next year, and they really just can\’t do the winter Olympics in Russia for 2014 because… I mean come on, it\’s the winter Olympics, no one really cares.

By: Jennifer De Alba

Jennifer De Alba — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:28:38 +0000

I think hangover 3 should be maybe about how Mr.Chow brakes out of jail or sum becuz i love Mr.Chow iz FUNNY as hell and to tell yhu the truth i really wanna see Mr.Chow in Hangover 3 because he iz my favorite but i dont think i wanna see ANOTHER guy get married nd someone getz lost but both of the movie were Hilarious nd i really want them to make another hangover and to Jake Hendricks i think you should see Hangover 2 because my opinion iz that the second one iz funnier than the 1st one nd to Carrie i really agree it is HECKA TRASHY!!
-Jennifer De Alba <3

By: Derek

Derek — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:28:38 +0000

\”but from Phillips’ comment, it may involve the Olympics in some way or form (unless he’s joking of course),\”

Um…he said it would be LIKE the Olympics in that cities would pitch to him and try to get him to come there.

By: manav

manav — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:28:38 +0000

We want the hangover 3 in india.

By: dana

dana — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:28:38 +0000

I think they should bring heather graham back for hangover 3.

By: Sean

Sean — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:28:38 +0000

Agreed Roy. Though BTTF 2 was entertaining and had an interesting spin/idea on the time travel bit (i ddi enjoy the future stuff), the third film was a vast improvement over the second, which suffered from a messed narrative flow.

By: Roy

Roy — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:28:38 +0000

Back to The Future Part III is far better than anybody remembers.

Seriously, check it out again. The 2nd is a mess, but the 3rd is really damn good.

By: Mark

Mark — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:28:38 +0000

Hangover 2 was a great movie…. However don’t spoil it with the previews in 3 like you did with 2.. I thought it would have been a lot more hysterical without seeing the previews first… i.e. the Mike Tyson tattoo…

By: Robert Streiferd

Robert Streiferd — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:28:38 +0000

I loved part III. Of course, that\’s just my opinion, I could be wrong.

-Robert Streiferd

By: carrie

carrie — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:28:38 +0000

i guess THE HANGOVER 3 will be in Hambourg (Germany) because the deutsch porn is so trashy

By: jimmiescoffee

jimmiescoffee — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:28:38 +0000

does todd phillips use \”who let the dogs out\” in this one?

By: Jake Hendricks

Jake Hendricks — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:28:38 +0000

The trailer mash-up is priceless. I don\’t need to see part 2 now. It\’s literally the same movie. Astonishing.

By: ken

ken — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:28:38 +0000

Back to the Future II is NOT medicore, part III? Perhaps, but part 2 is really fun.

By: &y

&y — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:28:38 +0000

Hangover 3 : how about JAPAN ? : ) it\’s gonna be awesome

By: &y

&y — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:28:38 +0000

Hangover 3 : how about JAPAN ? : ) it’s gonna be awesome

By: Dwight

Dwight — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:28:38 +0000

Alan should get married to the whore "she's a nice lady" from part 1

Comments on: Todd Phillips Says A ‘Hangover Part 3’ *Is* Being Planned & 17 More Things Learned From ‘Part II’

By: Susana

By: jarrod

By: Mason

By: christian

By: Dorian Stokely

By: Ashley

By: ritch

By: corlon

By: Ian

By: Steve

By: Jennifer De Alba

By: Derek

By: manav

By: dana

By: Sean

By: Roy

By: Mark

By: Robert Streiferd

By: carrie

By: jimmiescoffee

By: Jake Hendricks

By: ken

By: &y

By: &y

By: Dwight

Comments on: Todd Phillips Says A ‘Hangover Part 3’ Is Being Planned & 17 More Things Learned From ‘Part II’