<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Time Magazine Names Michael Haneke&#8217;s &#8216;Amour&#8217; The Best Film Of 2012	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-20121211/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-20121211/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:56:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Lucy		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-20121211/#comment-64079</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-103046/#comment-64079</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yay for Anna Karenina! I just saw it and I loved it. Beautiful film.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay for Anna Karenina! I just saw it and I loved it. Beautiful film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jingmei		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-20121211/#comment-64080</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jingmei]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-103046/#comment-64080</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For sure such kinda &#034;lists&#034; have sort of sub context intead of pure art&#x2F;cinematic perspectives. But I agree with this list, this is a good one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For sure such kinda &quot;lists&quot; have sort of sub context intead of pure art&#x2F;cinematic perspectives. But I agree with this list, this is a good one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: nightgoat72		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-20121211/#comment-64081</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nightgoat72]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-103046/#comment-64081</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I disagree with most of his list, but I give him major props for naming Dark Horse, which is a great movie that got no attention. Todd Solondz is a a genius, and a singular, totally original presence is American cinema. He deserves more adulation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with most of his list, but I give him major props for naming Dark Horse, which is a great movie that got no attention. Todd Solondz is a a genius, and a singular, totally original presence is American cinema. He deserves more adulation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AE		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-20121211/#comment-64082</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-103046/#comment-64082</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can someone please explain to me the kick to be found in Beasts of the Southern Wild? I just don&#x27;t get it? And I agree with the others re Cloud Atlas, the worst really?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone please explain to me the kick to be found in Beasts of the Southern Wild? I just don&#x27;t get it? And I agree with the others re Cloud Atlas, the worst really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Daniel Delago		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-20121211/#comment-64083</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Delago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-103046/#comment-64083</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I went back and read Corliss&#x27; review.  Interesting, he spends the first half of his &#x27;Cloud Altas&#x27; movie review talking about Lana Wachowski and her transgender.  It really has nothing to do with the film at all.  

As a film critic myself, &#x27;Cloud Atlas&#x27; is a masterwork.  It is the most daring and ambitious film of 2012.  To dismiss it as the &#x27;worst&#x27; film of the year is laughable.  Corliss brings up Kubrick&#x27;s film &#x27;2001: A Space Odyssey&#x27; in his review.  I&#x27;ve screened that film to audiences and found out that film was panned by critics when it first hit movie theatres in 1968.  Furthermore, MGM wanted to yank &#x27;2001&#x27; after just a few weeks in theatres due to poor ticket sales but the film took on a cult status among college students.  As we all know, it is now considered a classic.  &#x27;Cloud Atlas&#x27; will be appreciated more over time as well.  This film will be on my top ten list.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went back and read Corliss&#x27; review.  Interesting, he spends the first half of his &#x27;Cloud Altas&#x27; movie review talking about Lana Wachowski and her transgender.  It really has nothing to do with the film at all.  </p>
<p>As a film critic myself, &#x27;Cloud Atlas&#x27; is a masterwork.  It is the most daring and ambitious film of 2012.  To dismiss it as the &#x27;worst&#x27; film of the year is laughable.  Corliss brings up Kubrick&#x27;s film &#x27;2001: A Space Odyssey&#x27; in his review.  I&#x27;ve screened that film to audiences and found out that film was panned by critics when it first hit movie theatres in 1968.  Furthermore, MGM wanted to yank &#x27;2001&#x27; after just a few weeks in theatres due to poor ticket sales but the film took on a cult status among college students.  As we all know, it is now considered a classic.  &#x27;Cloud Atlas&#x27; will be appreciated more over time as well.  This film will be on my top ten list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marcus		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-20121211/#comment-64084</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-103046/#comment-64084</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Going into Cloud Atlas knowing nothing about the storyline or the film except for what the trailer showed me, I was captivated and went back to see it a second time and plan on seeing it again this week.  That movie was amazing in all aspects of film from the story to the acting to the visuals it created.  It&#x27;s a shame it&#x27;s not getting the love it deserves.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Going into Cloud Atlas knowing nothing about the storyline or the film except for what the trailer showed me, I was captivated and went back to see it a second time and plan on seeing it again this week.  That movie was amazing in all aspects of film from the story to the acting to the visuals it created.  It&#x27;s a shame it&#x27;s not getting the love it deserves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-20121211/#comment-64085</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-103046/#comment-64085</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am bewildered why people - in this instance, Kevin - are bewildered why &#x27;The Master&#x27; is not in THIS LIST or THAT LIST. It&#x27;s a freakin&#x27; Top Ten list: i.e. an individual picks THEIR FAVOURITE films of the year. Egads, so someone, somewhere, decided to not pick &#x27;The Master&#x27;: this is some kind of tragedy. And &#x27;Dark Horse&#x27; was picked because the choices in that film are informed by the story, and the story itself is a rewarding one. (Although The Playlist criticised it because it is, like, a Kevin James movie or something).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am bewildered why people &#8211; in this instance, Kevin &#8211; are bewildered why &#x27;The Master&#x27; is not in THIS LIST or THAT LIST. It&#x27;s a freakin&#x27; Top Ten list: i.e. an individual picks THEIR FAVOURITE films of the year. Egads, so someone, somewhere, decided to not pick &#x27;The Master&#x27;: this is some kind of tragedy. And &#x27;Dark Horse&#x27; was picked because the choices in that film are informed by the story, and the story itself is a rewarding one. (Although The Playlist criticised it because it is, like, a Kevin James movie or something).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sm		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-20121211/#comment-64086</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-103046/#comment-64086</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why on Earth is TDKR making top 10 lists? It&#x27;s pretty good but way too messy and flawed to actually be considered for best of the year, especially in a year with a LOT of great pictures.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why on Earth is TDKR making top 10 lists? It&#x27;s pretty good but way too messy and flawed to actually be considered for best of the year, especially in a year with a LOT of great pictures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: lenij		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-20121211/#comment-64087</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lenij]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-103046/#comment-64087</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[No PTA or Wes Anderson.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No PTA or Wes Anderson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-20121211/#comment-64088</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-103046/#comment-64088</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Corliss hated The Master. Probably becuase its a terrible film.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corliss hated The Master. Probably becuase its a terrible film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AS		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-20121211/#comment-64089</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-103046/#comment-64089</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A shameful list.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A shameful list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: u		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-20121211/#comment-64090</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[u]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-103046/#comment-64090</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Finally some love for Anna Karenina. It&#x27;s disgusting how much this film has been ignored.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally some love for Anna Karenina. It&#x27;s disgusting how much this film has been ignored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Uh oh		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-20121211/#comment-64091</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uh oh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-103046/#comment-64091</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[oh man, cue the fanboys upset by Cloud Atlas and man, they are gonna lose their shit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh man, cue the fanboys upset by Cloud Atlas and man, they are gonna lose their shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob Frenay		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-20121211/#comment-64092</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Frenay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/time-magazine-names-michael-hanekes-amour-the-best-film-of-2012-103046/#comment-64092</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In a year that had The Master and Holy Motors, how&#x2F;why are people losing their shit over Amour? It&#x27;s solid and well-made but this kind of praise is just baffling.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a year that had The Master and Holy Motors, how&#x2F;why are people losing their shit over Amour? It&#x27;s solid and well-made but this kind of praise is just baffling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
