Comments on: There Can Only Be Another One: Ryan Reynolds In Talks To Star In ‘Highlander’ Remake

By: moops

moops — Sun, 22 May 2016 04:01:25 +0000

i hope ryan reynolds dies in a fire

By: swachter

swachter — Sun, 22 May 2016 04:01:25 +0000

Most of the films he's made have been pretty good and he's been good in them, but not many people have seen them. They choose to watch dreck like Green Lantern instead, which despite being a "flop" probably grossed more than all of his fine independent and smaller budget films combined.

By: Mickey

Mickey — Sun, 22 May 2016 04:01:25 +0000

Okay I'll yell it, HIGHLANDER WAS A GREAT FILM!!! (The sequels not so much) Oh and Tv series was AWESOME! I'm also a fan of Reynolds but I would rather see him make an original film like Deadpool. I wish Hollywood would stop with the remakes and reboots.

By: caro

caro — Sun, 22 May 2016 04:01:25 +0000

if he works in kilt and shirtless,i will like the idea

By: Charles

Charles — Sun, 22 May 2016 04:01:25 +0000

That guy directed 28 weeks later, not 28 days later.

By: Traxz

Traxz — Sun, 22 May 2016 04:01:25 +0000

Highlander had a solid premise. And the first movie wasn't too bad either.

By: [A]

[A] — Sun, 22 May 2016 04:01:25 +0000

Terrible, terrible idea.

Next thing you know, they'll get some indie/pop band to cover Queen's songs

By: Kim

Kim — Sun, 22 May 2016 04:01:25 +0000

Oh god. My mom will love this. She loved all the movies. She has the whole series on VHS. I partially think she married my dad because my dad's part Scottish and from the highlands. Oh god. Last thing I need to see is another "Highlander" movie. I do need to see Ryan Reynolds in a kilt though.

By: Russell Mulcahy

Russell Mulcahy — Sun, 22 May 2016 04:01:24 +0000

How dare you (whisper it) comment on a film that defined a generation, yes it may not have been a massive blockbuster at the box office, but the cult films rarely do, start trek in its original form was as everyone knows canned very early on its life and now there are millions out there who would admit the films have touched there lives in a positive way. Its my guess the reviewers on this site probably were not even born when the first film came into being and in my opinion are in no position to comment about how good or bad it was, to use one analogy you could say its almost like someone saying to a world war 2 veteran how traumatising the war was when they weren't even there and didn't experience it. So please, in your efforts to make your writing more interesting do you think its possible without slating something you probably know little about?

As for the remake and the Ryan Reynolds issue, I think that a remake is not needed and tarnishes the original in its suggestion that a remake is necessary. Reynolds will not being as charismatic as Lambert was in that role and even when I think of him performing that part all I can think of when Mel Gibson tried to pull off William Wallace in Braveheart, only Gibson would be more convincing.