<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Films Of Steven Spielberg, Part One: The Spectacle	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-20111221/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-20111221/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:45:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Matthew Bradley		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-20111221/#comment-123746</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matthew Bradley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-254859/#comment-123746</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An excellent summation of DUEL.  Matheson has taken issue with many adaptations of his work, even some of those he scripted himself...but this isn&#x27;t one of them.  He has praised Spielberg for both remaining faithful to his teleplay and adding his own unique magic, making this a prime example of the collaborative art.  DUEL not only opened the door for Spielberg&#x27;s feature-film debut but also, in his capacity as a producer, led to such other career intersections as AMAZING STORIES and the recent REAL STEEL.  How apt that Koepp&#x27;s excellent STIR OF ECHOES is based on a Matheson novel.  For further information, see my book RICHARD MATHESON ON SCREEN (http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mcfarlandpub.com&#x2F;book-2.php?id=978-0-7864-4216-4).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent summation of DUEL.  Matheson has taken issue with many adaptations of his work, even some of those he scripted himself&#8230;but this isn&#x27;t one of them.  He has praised Spielberg for both remaining faithful to his teleplay and adding his own unique magic, making this a prime example of the collaborative art.  DUEL not only opened the door for Spielberg&#x27;s feature-film debut but also, in his capacity as a producer, led to such other career intersections as AMAZING STORIES and the recent REAL STEEL.  How apt that Koepp&#x27;s excellent STIR OF ECHOES is based on a Matheson novel.  For further information, see my book RICHARD MATHESON ON SCREEN (http:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mcfarlandpub.com&#x2F;book-2.php?id=978-0-7864-4216-4).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nolan		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-20111221/#comment-123747</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nolan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-254859/#comment-123747</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I recently rewatched &#034;Crystal Skull&#034; for the first time since it&#x27;s initial release.  It&#x27;s not quite as bad I remembered.  Full disclosure: I don&#x27;t like Shia, I don&#x27;t like the aliens, yet the infamous fridge scene doesn&#x27;t bother me in the least.

Surprisingly, I actually found the film to be pretty thematically strong.  Jones is presented as a character who has always been willing to, more or less, ransack the sanctity of cultural artifacts in the pursuit of knowledge, and &#034;Crystal Skull&#034; is more or less about him trying to make things right--about coming to grips with the idea that knowledge isn&#x27;t everything.  Indy realizes here that his adventuring ways have caused him to abandon the only woman he ever loved and a child he never knew he had, and in attempting to bring the skull back to where it belongs he aims to make good.  

Granted, this isn&#x27;t all presented in a neat, cohesive way.  I guess that&#x27;s why it&#x27;s so frustrating.  There really is a dynamite film there, they just didn&#x27;t execute it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently rewatched &quot;Crystal Skull&quot; for the first time since it&#x27;s initial release.  It&#x27;s not quite as bad I remembered.  Full disclosure: I don&#x27;t like Shia, I don&#x27;t like the aliens, yet the infamous fridge scene doesn&#x27;t bother me in the least.</p>
<p>Surprisingly, I actually found the film to be pretty thematically strong.  Jones is presented as a character who has always been willing to, more or less, ransack the sanctity of cultural artifacts in the pursuit of knowledge, and &quot;Crystal Skull&quot; is more or less about him trying to make things right&#8211;about coming to grips with the idea that knowledge isn&#x27;t everything.  Indy realizes here that his adventuring ways have caused him to abandon the only woman he ever loved and a child he never knew he had, and in attempting to bring the skull back to where it belongs he aims to make good.  </p>
<p>Granted, this isn&#x27;t all presented in a neat, cohesive way.  I guess that&#x27;s why it&#x27;s so frustrating.  There really is a dynamite film there, they just didn&#x27;t execute it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MishuPishu		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-20111221/#comment-123748</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MishuPishu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-254859/#comment-123748</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree with the bell curve on most of these, although I would drop each one by at least a half a grade given that Speilberg is one of the most overrated directors. A couple of exceptions -- Jaws was outstanding and easily his best. It&#x27;s slow burn intensity redefined how to make a thriller in the modern age of film. Too bad he&#x27;s forgotten that all great filmmaking allows the viewers imagination to blossom, which he completely fails to do with War of the Worlds, one of the worst movies ever made, no imagination whatsoever and every scene feeling more ridiculous than the one before. And last of all, I&#x27;m going to go out and say something sacrilege. E.T. is a very mediocre film. It has it&#x27;s moments and we all remember it fondly but I watched it again this year with my kids for the first time in a long long time and it just feels really dated. But most importantly it&#x27;s just lousy filmmaking, clunky and manipulative, for all of Spielberg&#x27;s accomplishments with creating style and wonder in his films of the 80&#x27;s, it stands out as one that feels like he phoned it in.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the bell curve on most of these, although I would drop each one by at least a half a grade given that Speilberg is one of the most overrated directors. A couple of exceptions &#8212; Jaws was outstanding and easily his best. It&#x27;s slow burn intensity redefined how to make a thriller in the modern age of film. Too bad he&#x27;s forgotten that all great filmmaking allows the viewers imagination to blossom, which he completely fails to do with War of the Worlds, one of the worst movies ever made, no imagination whatsoever and every scene feeling more ridiculous than the one before. And last of all, I&#x27;m going to go out and say something sacrilege. E.T. is a very mediocre film. It has it&#x27;s moments and we all remember it fondly but I watched it again this year with my kids for the first time in a long long time and it just feels really dated. But most importantly it&#x27;s just lousy filmmaking, clunky and manipulative, for all of Spielberg&#x27;s accomplishments with creating style and wonder in his films of the 80&#x27;s, it stands out as one that feels like he phoned it in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dariuscmd		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-20111221/#comment-123749</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dariuscmd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-254859/#comment-123749</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[it&#x27;s not that i love robert but when i watched twilight breaking dawn on-line @ twilight-breaking-dawn-streaming.info i understood that he was better in twilight eclipse..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#x27;s not that i love robert but when i watched twilight breaking dawn on-line @ twilight-breaking-dawn-streaming.info i understood that he was better in twilight eclipse..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: James		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-20111221/#comment-123750</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-254859/#comment-123750</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[MINORITY REPORT deals with themes touching on the &#034;war on terror&#034; only by pure coincidence. Although released in 2002, it was shot in the summer of 2001, before the events of 9&#x2F;11.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MINORITY REPORT deals with themes touching on the &quot;war on terror&quot; only by pure coincidence. Although released in 2002, it was shot in the summer of 2001, before the events of 9&#x2F;11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JD		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-20111221/#comment-123751</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-254859/#comment-123751</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hey, a Steven Spielberg article!  Great, another opportunity for the Playlist to scream about how much Crystal Skull sucks!  Because you gotta hate George Lucas or you&#x27;re not cool, right?  For god&#x27;s sake, somebody change this broken record.....

By the way, A). The Darabont script is an in-jokey mess that Lucas must have thrown across the room in frustration.  It reads like fanfic, complete with somebody loudly proclaiming at one point &#034;Adventure still has a name, and it&#x27;s Indiana Jones!&#034;  Yes, let&#x27;s have a character qoute the poster of Temple Of Doom.  Brilliant idea.  Of course, I&#x27;m sure the anti-Crystal Skull-ers probably would have loved it.  B).  There never was anything resembling a 1973 script by Lucas called &#034;The Adventures of Indiana Smith&#034;.  Nobody ever wrote a word of any script involving Indiana Jones until Lawrence Kasdan got hired in the late 70s.  C).  There were never any plans to do a full out alien invasion movie.  D). The idea of inter-dimensional aliens and Erik Von Dainaken type chariots of the gods is present in the Raiders story conference transcript.  It&#x27;s always been part of the vision for the character. E).  Crystal Skull is VERY far from Spielberg&#x27;s worst movie.  It&#x27;s a whole lot better then Hook, The Color Purple, and Last Crusade.

 And, last but not least, everybody who wants to complain about Crystal Skull and how terrible it is should take a look at some of those many rejected drafts for a fourth Indiana Jones films.  I&#x27;m thinking particularly of Chris Columbus&#x27; truly awful script, which was called something like &#034;Indiana Jones And The Monkey King&#034;.  This makes the Darabont script look like Robert Bolt&#x27;s draft of Lawrence Of Arabia.  You don&#x27;t like what&#x27;s in Crystal Skull?  Be glad you didn&#x27;t get the Columbus moment where a gorilla drives a tank.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, a Steven Spielberg article!  Great, another opportunity for the Playlist to scream about how much Crystal Skull sucks!  Because you gotta hate George Lucas or you&#x27;re not cool, right?  For god&#x27;s sake, somebody change this broken record&#8230;..</p>
<p>By the way, A). The Darabont script is an in-jokey mess that Lucas must have thrown across the room in frustration.  It reads like fanfic, complete with somebody loudly proclaiming at one point &quot;Adventure still has a name, and it&#x27;s Indiana Jones!&quot;  Yes, let&#x27;s have a character qoute the poster of Temple Of Doom.  Brilliant idea.  Of course, I&#x27;m sure the anti-Crystal Skull-ers probably would have loved it.  B).  There never was anything resembling a 1973 script by Lucas called &quot;The Adventures of Indiana Smith&quot;.  Nobody ever wrote a word of any script involving Indiana Jones until Lawrence Kasdan got hired in the late 70s.  C).  There were never any plans to do a full out alien invasion movie.  D). The idea of inter-dimensional aliens and Erik Von Dainaken type chariots of the gods is present in the Raiders story conference transcript.  It&#x27;s always been part of the vision for the character. E).  Crystal Skull is VERY far from Spielberg&#x27;s worst movie.  It&#x27;s a whole lot better then Hook, The Color Purple, and Last Crusade.</p>
<p> And, last but not least, everybody who wants to complain about Crystal Skull and how terrible it is should take a look at some of those many rejected drafts for a fourth Indiana Jones films.  I&#x27;m thinking particularly of Chris Columbus&#x27; truly awful script, which was called something like &quot;Indiana Jones And The Monkey King&quot;.  This makes the Darabont script look like Robert Bolt&#x27;s draft of Lawrence Of Arabia.  You don&#x27;t like what&#x27;s in Crystal Skull?  Be glad you didn&#x27;t get the Columbus moment where a gorilla drives a tank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rotch		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-20111221/#comment-123752</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rotch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-254859/#comment-123752</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If anything in his filmography deserves a solid F, it&#x27;s that Twilight Zone segment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anything in his filmography deserves a solid F, it&#x27;s that Twilight Zone segment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: James		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-20111221/#comment-123753</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-254859/#comment-123753</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You might want to make clear that Stoppard didn&#x27;t receive screen credit on LAST CRUSADE, so people don&#x27;t get confused. On the other hand, does anybody honestly think one of the credited writers came up with &#034;I WAS the next man!&#034; or &#034;I suddenly remembered my Charlemagne...&#034; :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to make clear that Stoppard didn&#x27;t receive screen credit on LAST CRUSADE, so people don&#x27;t get confused. On the other hand, does anybody honestly think one of the credited writers came up with &quot;I WAS the next man!&quot; or &quot;I suddenly remembered my Charlemagne&#8230;&quot; 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: James		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-20111221/#comment-123754</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-254859/#comment-123754</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[PPOLTERGEIST might make an interesting addendum to this list, since many of those involved (like the late Zelda Rubenstein) have been admitting that he directed a great deal of it, as was always suggested, in addition to writing, producing, and running post-production, as was always acknowledged.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PPOLTERGEIST might make an interesting addendum to this list, since many of those involved (like the late Zelda Rubenstein) have been admitting that he directed a great deal of it, as was always suggested, in addition to writing, producing, and running post-production, as was always acknowledged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-20111221/#comment-123755</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-254859/#comment-123755</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom is awesome, particularly the final 30 minutes. Pure cinema.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom is awesome, particularly the final 30 minutes. Pure cinema.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: hank		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-20111221/#comment-123756</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-254859/#comment-123756</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[where does &#034;Sugarland Express&#034; fit in? highly underrated film and one of his best, in my opinion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where does &quot;Sugarland Express&quot; fit in? highly underrated film and one of his best, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: weeee		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-20111221/#comment-123757</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[weeee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-254859/#comment-123757</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Peter Jackson looking all kinds of fly and sexy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Jackson looking all kinds of fly and sexy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jimmiescoffee		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-20111221/#comment-123758</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jimmiescoffee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/the-films-of-steven-spielberg-part-one-the-spectacle-254859/#comment-123758</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#x27;temple of doom&#x27; is awesome. otherwise, agree with everything.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#x27;temple of doom&#x27; is awesome. otherwise, agree with everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
