<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: ‘The Book Thief’ Screenwriter Disappointed By Fox’s Changes To Script, Desire For Family-Friendly Film	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/the-book-thief-screenwriter-disappointed-by-foxs-changes-to-script-desire-for-family-friendly-film-20140306/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/the-book-thief-screenwriter-disappointed-by-foxs-changes-to-script-desire-for-family-friendly-film-20140306/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:04:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: jami		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/the-book-thief-screenwriter-disappointed-by-foxs-changes-to-script-desire-for-family-friendly-film-20140306/#comment-109929</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jami]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/the-book-thief-screenwriter-disappointed-by-foxs-changes-to-script-desire-for-family-friendly-film-248414/#comment-109929</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The facts of this article are wrong. Especially in the short description of the movie. Her foster parents were FAR from neglectful. I feel that if you are going to write an article on a movie, you should at least WATCH the movie first. Poor journalism.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The facts of this article are wrong. Especially in the short description of the movie. Her foster parents were FAR from neglectful. I feel that if you are going to write an article on a movie, you should at least WATCH the movie first. Poor journalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark Kuban		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/the-book-thief-screenwriter-disappointed-by-foxs-changes-to-script-desire-for-family-friendly-film-20140306/#comment-109930</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Kuban]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/the-book-thief-screenwriter-disappointed-by-foxs-changes-to-script-desire-for-family-friendly-film-248414/#comment-109930</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Perhaps if you had actually read the full Inside Film article instead of cutting and pasting the only quote which seemingly supports your story, you would see the film was not âundoubtedly a disappointment for those who weathered its long journey.â   As the publisher of IF, I find it very disappointing when other media outlets use our work to bolster what is ultimately poor journalism. The quote you have pulled from Don Grovesâ article is completely out of context and has tainted what is actually a positive, and more importantly, factually correct piece.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps if you had actually read the full Inside Film article instead of cutting and pasting the only quote which seemingly supports your story, you would see the film was not âundoubtedly a disappointment for those who weathered its long journey.â   As the publisher of IF, I find it very disappointing when other media outlets use our work to bolster what is ultimately poor journalism. The quote you have pulled from Don Grovesâ article is completely out of context and has tainted what is actually a positive, and more importantly, factually correct piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
