Comments on: The Bane Of WB’s Existence: ‘Dark Knight Rises’ Media Screening Shut Down After IMAX Complications

By: puzz

puzz — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:06:27 +0000

None story. Who cares if the critics are pissed about some technical glitch at a screening?

By: Nolanfan

Nolanfan — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:06:27 +0000

I would have died of heart attack if i saw the movie only half the part.

By: Banshee

Banshee — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:06:27 +0000

Junketeers must be younger than ever these days given the juvenile humor in this breathless post.

By: yer

yer — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:06:27 +0000

The Dark Knight Rises is going to be the biggest circle jerk in film history.

By: Sally Albright

Sally Albright — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:06:27 +0000

Wait so were you guys actually there or…?

🙁

By: vonDread

vonDread — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:06:27 +0000

Oh boo fucking hoo. Critics have nothing to complain about as far as I'm concerned. They get to see every one of these movies early.

By: Chris Johnson

Chris Johnson — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:06:27 +0000

"it's likely not the finest beginning for the IMAX-is-better narrative" … That's what you've come to? That, on several levels, makes sense to you to say?

By: cirkusfolk

cirkusfolk — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:06:27 +0000

I think the news story should've been the rave reviews coming in, and this should've been a side bar note. I've been reading the tweets and mini reviews and I cannot wait another two weeks to see this film!

By: Ugh

Ugh — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:06:27 +0000

I like that you guys hide the news of the positive screening until the very end of the article.

There's good reporting & then there's just slutty hit whoring. This is the later.

By: Travis D.

Travis D. — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:06:27 +0000

Exactly what honest relevance does this article have? IMAX has been a successful business for nearly 30 years, and has more than proven itself as a first-class cinematic experience. To report on a technical snafu at an early screening is one thing; to try and twist it into some big, problematic issue that questions the relevancy of IMAX, Warner Bros, and the movie itself is just Edward Davis' way of using bad journalism to try and drum up unwarranted negative publicity for a major studio film. You should be ashamed.

By: AS

AS — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:06:27 +0000

If this happens to my screening…. I'm not even gonna go there…

By: Skeptik Hektik

Skeptik Hektik — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:06:27 +0000

What was the point of this article?

By: StephenM

StephenM — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:06:27 +0000

This *is* a silly little story, but commenters seem to be jumping on this as some wild unwarranted reporting that's trying to attack Nolan and the movie. The Playlist reports on silly little things like this all the time, they don't oversell this incident as one of huge importance, it's a three paragraph story, and people are just jumping on it because they're overexcited for the film (me too) and can't countenance anything not breathlessly excited for it.

By: Rohan

Rohan — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:06:27 +0000

This article, I think is the most childish article I have read when it comes to journalism. Wait!! – This is not journalism. It's non-sensical.

By: Kevin

Kevin — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:06:27 +0000

I know. I agree its un-journalistic. Way to go, playlist.

By: Nolan

Nolan — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:06:27 +0000

Who the **** is paying you to write like this?

By: Tom Cruise

Tom Cruise — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:06:26 +0000

I can take "the batman". Just get me in a ring with him. I'm Tom Cruise b!tches!