Comments on: ‘The Amazing Spider-Man’ Getting Trilogy Treatment; Producers Tease Sinister Six As Possible Villains

By: jeremy

jeremy — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:07:43 +0000

i loved this movie..great action scenes. would have loved to see the sewer scene and water fight play out longer…very intrigued about the trilogy…green goblin could be done again,better since the first one he kind of looked like a power rangers character….he is like the joker in batman. he's classic. they also need to re-do venom..he is the greatest villain ever and spiderman 3 ruined him (topher grace, really)

By: edgar

edgar — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:07:43 +0000

I think they should introduce carnage in the third movie

By: Mark

Mark — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:07:43 +0000

Keep it dark nightish…..throw in green goblin and vulture in the next one…. introduce venom at the end… SHOW A BRAIN BEING EATEN!!!!!!!!……i hate how they made the new one look dark but put in no grit….Kill someone off other then porr unkle ben for gods sake….Gwen, her dad, sh*t!

By: Dan

Dan — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:07:43 +0000

Please don't reuse any villains. Spider-Man has such a huge rogues gallery. We really don't need to see anymore frickin goblins.

By: DarkSpartan

DarkSpartan — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:07:43 +0000

And badguys for ASP2 should be 1.Kraven 2.Electro 3.Kingpin 4.Vulture 5.Shocker

Of course Venom would be #1. But he is everybodies #1. And you can't tell the tale of Venom w/o telling the origin of the symbiote.

By: DarkSpartan

DarkSpartan — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:07:43 +0000

I liked it. 4out5. Not as good as Avengers. But the story was engaging. Garfield is not bad. he is a good Peter Parker. Spider-man seemed more human in this movie. Not sure if he developed Spidey-sense yet, but he was getting his ass kicked. Emma Stone is super hot. And Sheen and Fields are an awesome Uncle Ben and Aunt May. I wish they wouldn't keep re-telling the orgin. Should of just umped in the Raimi universe. But the Raimi Spiderman films were going in the wrong direction. They were turning into the Joel Schumacher Batman movies.

And Tobey McGuire sucks.

By: Aidan Williams

Aidan Williams — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:07:43 +0000

Sounds like a interesting story idea.

By: StephenM

StephenM — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:07:43 +0000

I dunno. I liked this movie quite a bit, but part of the reason I liked it was its modesty and simple pleasures. It didn't try to be too complicated or epic, just told the story well. And part of the pleasures of Raimi's films was there simple, 4-color gleefulness that wasn't too wrapped up in backstory or mysteries but just wanted to show you a good time. These guys' plans sound way too ambitious and mysterious and complicated–we don't need to rehash everything the comics have ever done, we just want some good Spider-Man stories. The mystery about his parents was the most uninteresting thing in the movie, and they never even answered it, so planning to make that the centerpiece of some grand design seems pretty dumb to me–it can't hold that kinda weight. It sounds like they're thinking in serial terms, when they ought to be thinking in individual picture terms.

By: berk

berk — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:07:43 +0000

Well, if they just continued on from the previous Spider-Man movies (albeit with a new cast) instead of rebooting with another origin story we would be two movies away from the Sinister Six by now.

By treating a new cast & crew like a different comic book creative team taking over a book would give the new film team the option of continuing or ignoring what went before without having to start from scratch.