<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: SXSW Review: &#8216;Source Code&#8217; Is A Decent, But Familiar &#8216;Groundhog Day&#8217; Meets Action, Sci-Fi Thriller	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sxsw-review-source-code-is-a-decent-but-familiar-groundhog-day-meets-action-sci-fi-thriller-20110312/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sxsw-review-source-code-is-a-decent-but-familiar-groundhog-day-meets-action-sci-fi-thriller-20110312/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2020 06:00:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Harry Georgatos		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sxsw-review-source-code-is-a-decent-but-familiar-groundhog-day-meets-action-sci-fi-thriller-20110312/#comment-102452</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harry Georgatos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 14:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/sxsw-review-source-code-is-a-decent-but-familiar-groundhog-day-meets-action-sci-fi-thriller-119831/#comment-102452</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Haven\&#039;t seen it yet but the premise is intriguing. Like you said it\&#039;s a formula similar to GROUNDHOG DAY. Also it borrows from DEJA VU and the different perspectives of the movie VANTAGE POINT. This may not be another INCEPTION which is a hard act to follow but I\&#039;ll be still watching it nevertheless for it\&#039;s state-of-the-art premise and that I liked MOON.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven\&#8217;t seen it yet but the premise is intriguing. Like you said it\&#8217;s a formula similar to GROUNDHOG DAY. Also it borrows from DEJA VU and the different perspectives of the movie VANTAGE POINT. This may not be another INCEPTION which is a hard act to follow but I\&#8217;ll be still watching it nevertheless for it\&#8217;s state-of-the-art premise and that I liked MOON.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Christopher Bell		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sxsw-review-source-code-is-a-decent-but-familiar-groundhog-day-meets-action-sci-fi-thriller-20110312/#comment-102453</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Bell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 14:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/sxsw-review-source-code-is-a-decent-but-familiar-groundhog-day-meets-action-sci-fi-thriller-119831/#comment-102453</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Different writers. (For some reason, can\&#039;t link to the article... rp wrote the Moon review)

Even so - the crummy thing about reviews is that your opinion is too set in stone, but people generally don\&#039;t work like that.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Different writers. (For some reason, can\&#8217;t link to the article&#8230; rp wrote the Moon review)</p>
<p>Even so &#8211; the crummy thing about reviews is that your opinion is too set in stone, but people generally don\&#8217;t work like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: lrobhubbard		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sxsw-review-source-code-is-a-decent-but-familiar-groundhog-day-meets-action-sci-fi-thriller-20110312/#comment-102454</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lrobhubbard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 14:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/sxsw-review-source-code-is-a-decent-but-familiar-groundhog-day-meets-action-sci-fi-thriller-119831/#comment-102454</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I\&#039;ve seen this before, when Denzel Washington was starring.
Talk about Deja Vu...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I\&#8217;ve seen this before, when Denzel Washington was starring.<br />
Talk about Deja Vu&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: cirkusfolk		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sxsw-review-source-code-is-a-decent-but-familiar-groundhog-day-meets-action-sci-fi-thriller-20110312/#comment-102455</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cirkusfolk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 14:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/sxsw-review-source-code-is-a-decent-but-familiar-groundhog-day-meets-action-sci-fi-thriller-119831/#comment-102455</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I remember your review for Moon pretty much said the same thing minus the praise for Moon you now seem to have.  You said it was decent, but ultimately forgettable.  I guess with your review for the next Jones feaure, you\&#039;ll be saying it\&#039;s no Source Code.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember your review for Moon pretty much said the same thing minus the praise for Moon you now seem to have.  You said it was decent, but ultimately forgettable.  I guess with your review for the next Jones feaure, you\&#8217;ll be saying it\&#8217;s no Source Code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
