<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: SXSW Reportedly Rejects &#8216;The Canyons&#8217; Over &#8220;Quality Issues,&#8221; Paul Schrader Has &#8220;No Qualms&#8221; That The Film Is &#8220;Very Good&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sxsw-reportedly-rejects-the-canyons-over-quality-issues-paul-schrader-has-no-qualms-that-the-film-is-very-good-20130123/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sxsw-reportedly-rejects-the-canyons-over-quality-issues-paul-schrader-has-no-qualms-that-the-film-is-very-good-20130123/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:23:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Veronilka K.		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sxsw-reportedly-rejects-the-canyons-over-quality-issues-paul-schrader-has-no-qualms-that-the-film-is-very-good-20130123/#comment-112505</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Veronilka K.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/sxsw-reportedly-rejects-the-canyons-over-quality-issues-paul-schrader-has-no-qualms-that-the-film-is-very-good-249644/#comment-112505</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I heard that the only saving grace of this movie is how it looks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard that the only saving grace of this movie is how it looks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bob		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sxsw-reportedly-rejects-the-canyons-over-quality-issues-paul-schrader-has-no-qualms-that-the-film-is-very-good-20130123/#comment-112506</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/sxsw-reportedly-rejects-the-canyons-over-quality-issues-paul-schrader-has-no-qualms-that-the-film-is-very-good-249644/#comment-112506</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[$50 on Tribeca preeming it.  Those guys love high-profile cheese.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$50 on Tribeca preeming it.  Those guys love high-profile cheese.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Leonardo		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sxsw-reportedly-rejects-the-canyons-over-quality-issues-paul-schrader-has-no-qualms-that-the-film-is-very-good-20130123/#comment-112507</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leonardo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/sxsw-reportedly-rejects-the-canyons-over-quality-issues-paul-schrader-has-no-qualms-that-the-film-is-very-good-249644/#comment-112507</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[i hated thaat the magazine bashed the movie without having seen it yet, i feel bad for bith Lohan and Schrader.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hated thaat the magazine bashed the movie without having seen it yet, i feel bad for bith Lohan and Schrader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Roark		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sxsw-reportedly-rejects-the-canyons-over-quality-issues-paul-schrader-has-no-qualms-that-the-film-is-very-good-20130123/#comment-112508</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/sxsw-reportedly-rejects-the-canyons-over-quality-issues-paul-schrader-has-no-qualms-that-the-film-is-very-good-249644/#comment-112508</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I feel bad for Schrader.  Even if the movie sucks, its way unprofessional for these fest insiders to be bashing the film to reporters.  But I guess he sort of invited it on himself - per the Times Magazine piece, he really didn&#x27;t seem to know what he was getting into with Lohan.  It wasn&#x27;t just going to be the struggles getting her through the production - having her in the movie makes it an easy target and a punching bag before anyone has seen it.  And now that the clip and the magazine piece have come out there&#x27;s blood in the water.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel bad for Schrader.  Even if the movie sucks, its way unprofessional for these fest insiders to be bashing the film to reporters.  But I guess he sort of invited it on himself &#8211; per the Times Magazine piece, he really didn&#x27;t seem to know what he was getting into with Lohan.  It wasn&#x27;t just going to be the struggles getting her through the production &#8211; having her in the movie makes it an easy target and a punching bag before anyone has seen it.  And now that the clip and the magazine piece have come out there&#x27;s blood in the water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sxsw-reportedly-rejects-the-canyons-over-quality-issues-paul-schrader-has-no-qualms-that-the-film-is-very-good-20130123/#comment-112509</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/sxsw-reportedly-rejects-the-canyons-over-quality-issues-paul-schrader-has-no-qualms-that-the-film-is-very-good-249644/#comment-112509</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They should scale back and try Latin American Film Festivals.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should scale back and try Latin American Film Festivals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dan		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sxsw-reportedly-rejects-the-canyons-over-quality-issues-paul-schrader-has-no-qualms-that-the-film-is-very-good-20130123/#comment-112510</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/sxsw-reportedly-rejects-the-canyons-over-quality-issues-paul-schrader-has-no-qualms-that-the-film-is-very-good-249644/#comment-112510</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#034;an ugliness and a deadness to it.&#034;  -- seems all right considering the setting of the movie.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;an ugliness and a deadness to it.&quot;  &#8212; seems all right considering the setting of the movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Superzoom		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sxsw-reportedly-rejects-the-canyons-over-quality-issues-paul-schrader-has-no-qualms-that-the-film-is-very-good-20130123/#comment-112511</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Superzoom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/sxsw-reportedly-rejects-the-canyons-over-quality-issues-paul-schrader-has-no-qualms-that-the-film-is-very-good-249644/#comment-112511</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#x27;m thinking all the &#034;organizing&#034; in the world is not going to save your picture, Paul.  Maybe if you could &#034;organize&#034; a re-shoot with some real actors.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#x27;m thinking all the &quot;organizing&quot; in the world is not going to save your picture, Paul.  Maybe if you could &quot;organize&quot; a re-shoot with some real actors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
