<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: SXSW &#8217;12 Review: Weird &#038; Sometimes Confusing &#8216;John Dies At The End&#8217; Is Still An Odd &#038; Engaging Genre Treat	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sxsw-12-review-weird-sometimes-confusing-john-dies-at-the-end-is-still-an-odd-engaging-genre-treat-20120313/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sxsw-12-review-weird-sometimes-confusing-john-dies-at-the-end-is-still-an-odd-engaging-genre-treat-20120313/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:50:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Matt		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sxsw-12-review-weird-sometimes-confusing-john-dies-at-the-end-is-still-an-odd-engaging-genre-treat-20120313/#comment-81298</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/sxsw-12-review-weird-sometimes-confusing-john-dies-at-the-end-is-still-an-odd-engaging-genre-treat-112346/#comment-81298</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have heard that the film has been recut a bit since the Sundance screening (the new cut premiered at SXSW last night), so that&#x27;s just something to keep in mind. I was hoping for a new review instead of a reprint of the Sundance review.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have heard that the film has been recut a bit since the Sundance screening (the new cut premiered at SXSW last night), so that&#x27;s just something to keep in mind. I was hoping for a new review instead of a reprint of the Sundance review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
