<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Surprise: &#8216;Moonlight&#8217; Tops &#8216;Manchester By The Sea&#8217; And &#8216;La La Land&#8217; At WGA Awards	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/surprise-moonlight-top-manchester-by-the-sea-la-la-land-wga-awards-20170220/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/surprise-moonlight-top-manchester-by-the-sea-la-la-land-wga-awards-20170220/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 18:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: ponsoldt		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/surprise-moonlight-top-manchester-by-the-sea-la-la-land-wga-awards-20170220/#comment-152343</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ponsoldt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.net/?p=359275#comment-152343</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[why is it a surprise that the screenplay for &quot;moonlight&quot; won, over &quot;la la land&quot; and &quot;manchester&quot;?  

this, interestingly, was the correct decision:  &quot;la la land&quot; is a good, enjoyable film, but not great, and its script is just &quot;average&quot;--nothing original about it.  &quot;manchester&#039;s&quot; script is mostly very good, but it is too long by about 20 minutes:  definitely needs cutting.  &quot;moonlight&quot;, by contrast, is very good throughout, although the third act is not quite as strong as the first two.  

actually, the &quot;hell or high water&quot; script is equally good, but &quot;manchester&quot; ably deals with a difficult subject.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why is it a surprise that the screenplay for &#8220;moonlight&#8221; won, over &#8220;la la land&#8221; and &#8220;manchester&#8221;?  </p>
<p>this, interestingly, was the correct decision:  &#8220;la la land&#8221; is a good, enjoyable film, but not great, and its script is just &#8220;average&#8221;&#8211;nothing original about it.  &#8220;manchester&#8217;s&#8221; script is mostly very good, but it is too long by about 20 minutes:  definitely needs cutting.  &#8220;moonlight&#8221;, by contrast, is very good throughout, although the third act is not quite as strong as the first two.  </p>
<p>actually, the &#8220;hell or high water&#8221; script is equally good, but &#8220;manchester&#8221; ably deals with a difficult subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
