<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Steven Soderbergh Throws Himself Under The Bus For ‘The Underneath’; Talks Criterion ‘King of The Hill’	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/steven-soderbergh-throws-himself-under-the-bus-for-the-underneath-talks-criterion-king-of-the-hill-20140311/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/steven-soderbergh-throws-himself-under-the-bus-for-the-underneath-talks-criterion-king-of-the-hill-20140311/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:59:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: jonnybon		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/steven-soderbergh-throws-himself-under-the-bus-for-the-underneath-talks-criterion-king-of-the-hill-20140311/#comment-36777</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jonnybon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/steven-soderbergh-throws-himself-under-the-bus-for-the-underneath-talks-criterion-king-of-the-hill-88388/#comment-36777</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[King of the Hill is brilliant. Soderbergh&#x27;s best.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>King of the Hill is brilliant. Soderbergh&#x27;s best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: eddie lydecker		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/steven-soderbergh-throws-himself-under-the-bus-for-the-underneath-talks-criterion-king-of-the-hill-20140311/#comment-36778</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eddie lydecker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/steven-soderbergh-throws-himself-under-the-bus-for-the-underneath-talks-criterion-king-of-the-hill-88388/#comment-36778</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Steven Soderberghs films are ALL pretentious unwatchable hogwash.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven Soderberghs films are ALL pretentious unwatchable hogwash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brad		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/steven-soderbergh-throws-himself-under-the-bus-for-the-underneath-talks-criterion-king-of-the-hill-20140311/#comment-36779</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/steven-soderbergh-throws-himself-under-the-bus-for-the-underneath-talks-criterion-king-of-the-hill-88388/#comment-36779</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Soderbergh is, seemingly, one of the most self-aware filmmakers out there. I completely agree with his assessment of &#x27;The Underneath&#x27;. Yes, it&#x27;s visually striking and has an excellent, excellent performance from Gallagher (seriously, that gambling&#x2F;football scene has to be one of the actor&#x27;s finest moments on screen) but so what? The film&#x27;s neither a particularly penetrative psychological study nor a particularly thrilling genre film. It&#x27;s stuck between these two extremes and too rigid to balance them with any deft. He&#x27;s returned to many of the same concerns and narrative tropes with greater clarity in films like &#x27;Out of Sight&#x27;, &#x27;The Limey&#x27; and &#x27;Traffic&#x27;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soderbergh is, seemingly, one of the most self-aware filmmakers out there. I completely agree with his assessment of &#x27;The Underneath&#x27;. Yes, it&#x27;s visually striking and has an excellent, excellent performance from Gallagher (seriously, that gambling&#x2F;football scene has to be one of the actor&#x27;s finest moments on screen) but so what? The film&#x27;s neither a particularly penetrative psychological study nor a particularly thrilling genre film. It&#x27;s stuck between these two extremes and too rigid to balance them with any deft. He&#x27;s returned to many of the same concerns and narrative tropes with greater clarity in films like &#x27;Out of Sight&#x27;, &#x27;The Limey&#x27; and &#x27;Traffic&#x27;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
