<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: So How Come &#8216;The Lone Ranger&#8217; Was Going To Cost $250 Million? 5 Reasons Disney Got Cold Feet	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/so-how-come-the-lone-ranger-was-going-to-cost-250-million-5-reasons-disney-got-cold-feet-20110815/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/so-how-come-the-lone-ranger-was-going-to-cost-250-million-5-reasons-disney-got-cold-feet-20110815/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 14:01:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Film Budget		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/so-how-come-the-lone-ranger-was-going-to-cost-250-million-5-reasons-disney-got-cold-feet-20110815/#comment-90847</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Film Budget]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 14:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/so-how-come-the-lone-ranger-was-going-to-cost-250-million-5-reasons-disney-got-cold-feet-116897/#comment-90847</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Disney has never shied away from pulling back from the abyss of producing a movie with an excessive film budget and your article points out valid reasons.   Having Johnny in a seemingly supporting role would also seem to cause pause at the immense cost before, as stated, marketing, publicity and ATL profit participation.  Notes from the script sound cool, it should be reborn at a more sane budget level.  http://filmbudget.com]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disney has never shied away from pulling back from the abyss of producing a movie with an excessive film budget and your article points out valid reasons.   Having Johnny in a seemingly supporting role would also seem to cause pause at the immense cost before, as stated, marketing, publicity and ATL profit participation.  Notes from the script sound cool, it should be reborn at a more sane budget level.  <a href="http://filmbudget.com" rel="nofollow ugc">http://filmbudget.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Neo_3		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/so-how-come-the-lone-ranger-was-going-to-cost-250-million-5-reasons-disney-got-cold-feet-20110815/#comment-90848</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neo_3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 14:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/so-how-come-the-lone-ranger-was-going-to-cost-250-million-5-reasons-disney-got-cold-feet-116897/#comment-90848</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I would leave Oz where it is, could duplicate Alice\&#039;s box office.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would leave Oz where it is, could duplicate Alice\&#8217;s box office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
