<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Slow Box-Office Finds ‘Mr. Peabody &#038; Sherman’ In First Place; ‘Need For Speed’ Stalls In 3rd	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/slow-box-office-finds-mr-peabody-need-for-speed-stalls-in-3rd-20140316/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/slow-box-office-finds-mr-peabody-need-for-speed-stalls-in-3rd-20140316/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:55:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: swell		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/slow-box-office-finds-mr-peabody-need-for-speed-stalls-in-3rd-20140316/#comment-36331</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[swell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/slow-box-office-finds-mr-peabody-need-for-speed-stalls-in-3rd-88110/#comment-36331</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The analysis of Veronica Mars is silly... it had the second highest per screen average this week, behind only Anderson&#x27;s latest limited juggernaut, playing only in wall-in performances at AMC theaters.   The VOD numbers you mention should give it a solid bump (they&#x27;ve not been released, obviously, but I&#x27;ve no doubt Rob Thomas will weigh in on those in the next couple of days) and with a modest marketing push, nearly every dollar is profit.  If it clears 5 million at the BO, ancillary not included (VOD, cable rights, DVD sales, renewed catalog interest, etc), that&#x27;s a pretty good showing... a quick perusal of the websites known for its BO analysis arrived at the opposite conclusion and fan buzz is far from &#034;pissed&#034;.   Thomas, Bell, and WB indicated this weekend that all parties would be interested in sequel talks or a miniseries if Mars turned a profit, which it will.

There were no expectations of this being massive game changer...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The analysis of Veronica Mars is silly&#8230; it had the second highest per screen average this week, behind only Anderson&#x27;s latest limited juggernaut, playing only in wall-in performances at AMC theaters.   The VOD numbers you mention should give it a solid bump (they&#x27;ve not been released, obviously, but I&#x27;ve no doubt Rob Thomas will weigh in on those in the next couple of days) and with a modest marketing push, nearly every dollar is profit.  If it clears 5 million at the BO, ancillary not included (VOD, cable rights, DVD sales, renewed catalog interest, etc), that&#x27;s a pretty good showing&#8230; a quick perusal of the websites known for its BO analysis arrived at the opposite conclusion and fan buzz is far from &quot;pissed&quot;.   Thomas, Bell, and WB indicated this weekend that all parties would be interested in sequel talks or a miniseries if Mars turned a profit, which it will.</p>
<p>There were no expectations of this being massive game changer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
