Comments on: Simon Kinberg Explains Why Rogue Was Cut From ‘X-Men: Days Of Future Past’ Plus Quicksilver Clip

By: Tristan

Tristan — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:23:08 +0000

*spoiler* since Wolverine sucessfully changed the future and Mystique didn't actually kill those government officicals the timeline for rogue may have changed. Meaning maybe Mystique did end up raising her and now Rogue will possibly have crossed paths with Ms Marvel by the time Age of Apocalpyse. I feel like Rogue will def be super power'd in that movie. Professor told Wolverine in the end that they have alot to talk about. Im just upset that they never explained why professor was alive even after Phoenix killed him

By: john

john — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:23:08 +0000

They cut Rogue? I'm not even sure I want to see this stupid crap they probably completely screwed up the time line and story of the x-men universe.
The story is probably nothing to do with the 90s fox kids cartoon either with forge , wolverine time traveling and bishop and cable ect.

By: Mandy

Mandy — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:23:08 +0000

I'm glad they kept that out. There was a lot of consistency errors, and having her there like that would have been another. She took the cure in X-Men 3, so according to their timeline, she should be powerless.

By: Rae

Rae — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:23:08 +0000

The urgency wouldn't have changed anyway. It was never about how long Kitty could keep him in the past it was about how long she was ABLE to keep him in the past due to the Sentinels impending attack. Yet again another excuse to cover up the complete mess they made of Rouge. They took one of the most beloved characters and ruined her. I am not impressed with any of the x-men movies. They can't even keep a consistent time line through there own movies, yes X3 was a big wrench in things but the other movies aren't consistent either. I just want to see an X-men movies with the badass characters I grew up watching.

By: Since804

Since804 — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:23:08 +0000

I'm glad they kept her out. Anna Paquin may "shine" in other roles but in X-Men she's a total drag and COMPLETELY ruins one of the most interesting characters in the series. Rogue was grossly miscast and I would have preferred Rogue be left out altogether than give us this crappy, useless, annoyingly passive character that serves no purpose.

By: Zac

Zac — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:23:08 +0000

They should have never cut Rogue from this movie. Rogue should have been a major story line to this movie for the primary reason that the Super Sentinels of the future could absorb powers. In DOFP they tried to explain that it was Mystique's power that allowed the sentinels to do that, however Mystique's power is ONLY to shape shift, she never had the ability to absorb or manipulate the mutant power of anyone. It would have taken Rogue's power to give the Super Sentinels that power, which ultimately is what made them strong enough to defeat the x-men (in the new DOFP movie).

By: freddy

freddy — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:23:08 +0000

well Rogue is a pretty cool character i don't know why Bryan Singer made her character look crappy. they either should not put her in the first place or made her look cool. But in my opinion they should just put another character for the next movie. And Bryan keep up the good work.

By: CJ

CJ — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:23:08 +0000

And this is exactly why I won't see this movie. Rogue is my favorite and I absolutely love Anna Paquin. Cutting her from the movie cut my money from their pockets. I won't even purchase it when it comes out on DVD, especially when you can always find the deleted scene online at some point.

By: William

William — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:23:08 +0000

"X-Men: Days Of Future Past" is without question the best X-Men film. A tour de force by Bryan Singer. I don't understand why anyone is saying that this film "screwed up" the timline?

Brett Ratner did that with the awful "X-Men: The Last Stand".

This movie basically fixed that. Watch the final scenes of "DOFP" and you will see.
The "Prison Break" sequence with Quicksilver is worth the price of admission alone.

I wish everyone would stop attacking this movie. Those who haven't seen it are guilty of
judging a 2 hour+ film by a trailer? Or someone's word? Go see it, if you're disappointed then
you might enjoy Brett Ratner's "Hercules" or Michael Bay's "Transformers with Marky Mark".

Nuff Said!

By: David

David — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:23:08 +0000

I enjoyed the movie but was really wanting to see a Rogue that was powered up.

I wanted the Rogue that had the Carol Danvers powers or wanted to see her absorb all of the X-Men's powers to see her trash some Sentinels. I have waited a long time to see if Singer would actually due Rogue some justice.

Looks like I will have to wait for the next movie.

By: Remy LeBeau

Remy LeBeau — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:23:08 +0000

No one is crying from Rogue's part being snipped, she's such a bad character in the original trilogy, she's a walking mcguffin in the first, irrelevant in the second and basically a traitor in the third. Not even a mention to her comic origins, they half assed her powers and butchered the original character.

By: Ferdinand

Ferdinand — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:23:08 +0000

It is not Anna Paquin's fault that Rogue on the X-Men films is crappy. Trust me she can act like how the real Rogue acts. It's how the director, who was not an X-Men fan to begin with that made Rogue like that. Rogue in that future couldn't have gotten Ms. Marvel's powers because Rogue didn't get the chance to be fostered by Mystique. Rogue was working for the bad guys at the time she absorbed Ms. Marvel's powers.

By: Mike

Mike — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:23:08 +0000

Rogue's powers were the ones the Sentinels really needed to absorb other mutant powers not Mystic's. She is a shape shifter she doesn't copy other mutants powers.

By: John

John — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:23:08 +0000

Ive not seen x men and i just typed it in google to see this headline thanks for ruining it for me… SPOILER ALERT sign please?!?!?

By: xavier

xavier — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:23:08 +0000

They never wrote Rogue right in the first place, and did a disservice that translated into Anna Paquin\’s performance. Maybe not having Mystique in her life softened/weakened her resolve. As for super powers, in the comics, mutants lose and regain their powers over the years and different plots, it\’s not a stretch to regain or even get secondary mutations, something the films never properly touched either. They cherry picked and got a few sour ones.

By: justagoodguy

justagoodguy — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:23:08 +0000

Tristan: You shoud see the Post-credits scene from X-Men Last Stand.
You will understand why professor is alive.

By: Angela

Angela — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:23:08 +0000

Oh please they need to give up the bull they cut Rogue because they felt it better to give mystic air time because Jennifer Laurence and center the movie around Wolverine then have the story line actually makes sense or be comic book accurate

By: Mike

Mike — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:23:08 +0000

How about they explain why the Sentinels did not target themselves…since they apparently have the mutant X gene harvested from Mystique within them in order to "adapt" and shape shift…don't get me wrong, I loved the movie, but that was a major plot issue on Singers part.

By: JAMIE

JAMIE — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:23:08 +0000

can anybody tell when the professor was paralised from hip below in part 5: X-men 1st class then how come he stand and walk in part 4:X-men wolverine origins????he is shown standing, bald and aged at the end of the part 4: wolverine origins…how??

By: JackDarkBlack

JackDarkBlack — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:23:08 +0000

Anybody else thinks that Jennifer Lawerence is overrated? Unfairly got the award in Silver Lining's Playbook given that her role was so basic, while Bradley Cooper put on a showcase in acting? Jennifer Lawerence is so boring and she has the same facial expression throughout a movie. Boring!

By: Jon H

Jon H — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:23:08 +0000

I really don't think Rogue would have "stopped the clock". The sentinels were still coming anyway, and that's the real reason why (if the past hadn't been changed) they ended up just about dead in the present. Man, I so wish Rogue's scenes hadn't been cut! Still an amazing movie nonetheless.

By: Joe

Joe — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:23:08 +0000

They ruined Rogue. They ruined everything. Learn from the animated series Brian Singer!

By: Will

Will — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:23:08 +0000

Cutting those scenes out was wrong ,it took away a chance to see the original cast together as a whole and simply see the Xmen work together as a Team . It would not have taken away from anything .To me it always is about selling the DVD with deleted scenes. If anything put them back into the movie and make it right.

By: Junyasayhow

Junyasayhow — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:23:08 +0000

please let this be the last of the Bryan Singer hack jobs called Xmen that in reality have all been movies dedicated to Hugh Jackman playing wolverine as a tall no fighting ability (other than bar room brawling), muscle flexing metrosexual in skinny jeans. Hopefully there's a reboot coming soon with action, and special effect scenes better than the ones meant for broadway that Singer brings to the table. A movie that will actually respect the material and not turn cool, sexy characters like mystique into a strange rubber/scaley looking being with a kling-on forehead, greasy hair and no sexual organs. Or characters like beast into some cheap remake of Michael Jackson's Thriller wolfman costume. Give it to someone like Zack Snyder.

By: tyler

tyler — Fri, 13 May 2016 07:23:08 +0000

Hiccup meets his mom, some dude from another country starts to hunt dragons. They capture hiccup's and some dragons. Mom, dad , hiccup and friends all work together and free the dragons.bad guy start to love the dragons in the end . The bloody trailer spoiled the entire movie for me.

The trailer completely spoiled the movie experience at the cinema. What a wasted opportunity ? Winter soldier, Days of future past and how to train your dragon 2 has entire story within the trailer. Any person with common sense can figure out what is going to happen in the beginning , in the middle and in the end. Why studios do this? I watched the edge of tomorrow and it blew me away. Then I watched the trailer for EOT and the entire movie and its key plots including what is the WHOLE movie about in the 2 min 20 sec trailer. I did some online research and found out most of true film lovers NEVER watch the trailer before watching the actual movie because it completely destroys the entire movie experience. google" Kinsta presents – Why I Don't Watch Trailers" May everyone enjoy the movies to the max. ( Never watch trailers again)