<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Sight &#038; Sound Unveil Full &#8216;Greatest Films Of All Time&#8217; List; Robert Altman, Ridley Scott &#038; More Crack Top 100	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-20120816/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-20120816/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:45:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Joy		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-20120816/#comment-71153</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-107093/#comment-71153</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[bicycle thieves on no.33.are you kidding me?and where is Shoeshine,Rome Open City,Wild Strawberries,Pather Panchali,The Good The Bad And The ugly,Pulp Fiction,Schindler&#x27;s List,The Shawshank Redemption,Lawrence of Arabia......]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bicycle thieves on no.33.are you kidding me?and where is Shoeshine,Rome Open City,Wild Strawberries,Pather Panchali,The Good The Bad And The ugly,Pulp Fiction,Schindler&#x27;s List,The Shawshank Redemption,Lawrence of Arabia&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jack Grapes		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-20120816/#comment-71154</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Grapes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-107093/#comment-71154</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The purpose of a list is to remind you of a film you may have missed or known about but not yet seen. Of course we could argue the selections. Where was Michael Powell&#x27;s RED SHOES and I KNOW WHERE I&#x27;M GOING and BLACK NARCISSUS. And you know what? What about THE BEST YEARS OF OUR LIVES. I&#x27;ve seen that movie a dozen times or more, and each time I discover something amazing, the way a shot is framed, how Wyler places the most important scene in the background, like when Dana Andrews is in the phone booth way in the background and the foreground they&#x27;re all gathered around Hogey Carmichael playing the piano. And you can&#x27;t take your eyes off of Dana Andrews, and that phone call, which you can&#x27;t even hear. Casablanca at #84??!?!?!?! But the point is, look over half a dozen to a dozen such lists, and go out and see the films you haven&#x27;t seen yet and decide for yourself. That&#x27;s the point really. Will I devalue a film just because it wasn&#x27;t rated higher by someone else? Absurd, of course not. Was Ikura on the list? Ivan the Terrible? I think I missed La Strada. Did I miss that, or was it not on the list. How could that be? So that&#x27;s on my list. If you haven&#x27;t seen it, go see it. Time was, I used to have to scour the TV guide to see what movie was playing at 2am, so I could see it, or wait anxiously for it to come to a local revival theatre. Now, they&#x27;re all for the most part readily available. What about DAVE. I&#x27;d be an idiot to put it on a top 500 list. But why do I watch it whenever it&#x27;s on tv, more importantly, why can&#x27;t I STOP watching it. Same for RANDOM HARVEST. You haven&#x27;t seen it?!?! Well, get off your Big Boy Recliner and see it! And then catch THE ENCHANTED COTTAGE. And STROMBOLI. And BALLAD OF A SOLDIER (Russian film). What about TOOTSIE? Try to stop watching it once you start. Was PATHS OF GLORY on the list, I think so? Not sure. But what about SMOKE. You haven&#x27;t seen SMOKE with Harvey Keitel? try getting past the film maven at the Pearly Gates not having seen SMOKE! And LAURA? Okay, I know I know. But really, isn&#x27;t there a list for &#034;guity pleasures&#034;? What about companion remakes as a set of bookends, like TO BE OR NOT TO BE, the one with Jack Benny and Carole Lombarde and Robert Stack, and the one with Mel Brooks, etc. Was A PLACE IN THE SUN on the list? Can&#x27;t remember. Or the OX-BOW INCIDENT? Who cares about that list. Don&#x27;t be a slave to it. Go see the OX-BOW INCIDENT and report back to me. You&#x27;ll see. Just to be ornery, somebody&#x27;s got to put ABBOT &#038; COSTELLO MEET FRANKENSTEIN on the list. I mean, what the fedora! BRIEF ENCOUNTER? Try to imagine you&#x27;re living in England in the 50s, get a cup of tea and watch it. Pretend a little. A movie is not just a movie, it&#x27;s a place in time, and you can take part in it and live somewhere you&#x27;ve never lived before. Let the movie do it for you. DODSWORTH, just for the scene when she tells him she&#x27;s staying in Europe, to see how Walter Huston plays it. Masterful. And are you gonna gets nobby and not stand up and defend the real great B movie of all time, DETOUR. If you haven&#x27;t seen it, see it. Forget if it&#x27;s #876 on somebody&#x27;s list. DEAD OF NIGHT. See the movie from which Rod Serling stole (yes, I said stole) three plots for his Twilight Zone series. Or maybe even four. You haven&#x27;t seen DEAD OF NIGHT. Treat yourself buddy-boy to a fun experience, just make sure you wear the right clothes and pop some corn in the kitchen first. Hello GOODBYE MR. CHIPS, the original. What about WHO SHOT you know who? GROUNDHOG DAY, MY DARLING CLEMENTINE, REBECCA, RED RIVER, STRICTLY BALLROOM, STALAG 17, THE BIG CLOCK, THE LAVENDER HILL MOB, THE OLD DARK HOUSE, THIS GUN FOR HIRE, WHISKEY GALORE, -- this is not a best list, just movies that if you haven&#x27;t seen, you&#x27;ll be a better person for seeing them. When all the snobby intellectuals at the party start touting best films, you can speak up and pipe them down with RUNAWAY TRAIN, OUT OF THE PAST, DUCK SOUP, ATLANTIC CITY, GOODFELLAS, BLOOD SIMPLE, and GIANT. Okay, I&#x27;m tired. Gotta go check out LOCAL HERO, playing now on television. The red telephone booth. It abides.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The purpose of a list is to remind you of a film you may have missed or known about but not yet seen. Of course we could argue the selections. Where was Michael Powell&#x27;s RED SHOES and I KNOW WHERE I&#x27;M GOING and BLACK NARCISSUS. And you know what? What about THE BEST YEARS OF OUR LIVES. I&#x27;ve seen that movie a dozen times or more, and each time I discover something amazing, the way a shot is framed, how Wyler places the most important scene in the background, like when Dana Andrews is in the phone booth way in the background and the foreground they&#x27;re all gathered around Hogey Carmichael playing the piano. And you can&#x27;t take your eyes off of Dana Andrews, and that phone call, which you can&#x27;t even hear. Casablanca at #84??!?!?!?! But the point is, look over half a dozen to a dozen such lists, and go out and see the films you haven&#x27;t seen yet and decide for yourself. That&#x27;s the point really. Will I devalue a film just because it wasn&#x27;t rated higher by someone else? Absurd, of course not. Was Ikura on the list? Ivan the Terrible? I think I missed La Strada. Did I miss that, or was it not on the list. How could that be? So that&#x27;s on my list. If you haven&#x27;t seen it, go see it. Time was, I used to have to scour the TV guide to see what movie was playing at 2am, so I could see it, or wait anxiously for it to come to a local revival theatre. Now, they&#x27;re all for the most part readily available. What about DAVE. I&#x27;d be an idiot to put it on a top 500 list. But why do I watch it whenever it&#x27;s on tv, more importantly, why can&#x27;t I STOP watching it. Same for RANDOM HARVEST. You haven&#x27;t seen it?!?! Well, get off your Big Boy Recliner and see it! And then catch THE ENCHANTED COTTAGE. And STROMBOLI. And BALLAD OF A SOLDIER (Russian film). What about TOOTSIE? Try to stop watching it once you start. Was PATHS OF GLORY on the list, I think so? Not sure. But what about SMOKE. You haven&#x27;t seen SMOKE with Harvey Keitel? try getting past the film maven at the Pearly Gates not having seen SMOKE! And LAURA? Okay, I know I know. But really, isn&#x27;t there a list for &quot;guity pleasures&quot;? What about companion remakes as a set of bookends, like TO BE OR NOT TO BE, the one with Jack Benny and Carole Lombarde and Robert Stack, and the one with Mel Brooks, etc. Was A PLACE IN THE SUN on the list? Can&#x27;t remember. Or the OX-BOW INCIDENT? Who cares about that list. Don&#x27;t be a slave to it. Go see the OX-BOW INCIDENT and report back to me. You&#x27;ll see. Just to be ornery, somebody&#x27;s got to put ABBOT &amp; COSTELLO MEET FRANKENSTEIN on the list. I mean, what the fedora! BRIEF ENCOUNTER? Try to imagine you&#x27;re living in England in the 50s, get a cup of tea and watch it. Pretend a little. A movie is not just a movie, it&#x27;s a place in time, and you can take part in it and live somewhere you&#x27;ve never lived before. Let the movie do it for you. DODSWORTH, just for the scene when she tells him she&#x27;s staying in Europe, to see how Walter Huston plays it. Masterful. And are you gonna gets nobby and not stand up and defend the real great B movie of all time, DETOUR. If you haven&#x27;t seen it, see it. Forget if it&#x27;s #876 on somebody&#x27;s list. DEAD OF NIGHT. See the movie from which Rod Serling stole (yes, I said stole) three plots for his Twilight Zone series. Or maybe even four. You haven&#x27;t seen DEAD OF NIGHT. Treat yourself buddy-boy to a fun experience, just make sure you wear the right clothes and pop some corn in the kitchen first. Hello GOODBYE MR. CHIPS, the original. What about WHO SHOT you know who? GROUNDHOG DAY, MY DARLING CLEMENTINE, REBECCA, RED RIVER, STRICTLY BALLROOM, STALAG 17, THE BIG CLOCK, THE LAVENDER HILL MOB, THE OLD DARK HOUSE, THIS GUN FOR HIRE, WHISKEY GALORE, &#8212; this is not a best list, just movies that if you haven&#x27;t seen, you&#x27;ll be a better person for seeing them. When all the snobby intellectuals at the party start touting best films, you can speak up and pipe them down with RUNAWAY TRAIN, OUT OF THE PAST, DUCK SOUP, ATLANTIC CITY, GOODFELLAS, BLOOD SIMPLE, and GIANT. Okay, I&#x27;m tired. Gotta go check out LOCAL HERO, playing now on television. The red telephone booth. It abides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tmi		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-20120816/#comment-71155</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tmi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-107093/#comment-71155</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Anyone have a clue whether the singular director votes can be soon seen?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone have a clue whether the singular director votes can be soon seen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: S		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-20120816/#comment-71156</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-107093/#comment-71156</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think you&#x27;ve copied this list from the magazine.  The websites full list of the top 250 includes Fassbinders &#034;Fear Eats the Soul&#034; at equal 93rd.  Dont know why the discrepancy but noticed it this morning when going over the results.
Dont know why the discrepancy but thought it worth noting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#x27;ve copied this list from the magazine.  The websites full list of the top 250 includes Fassbinders &quot;Fear Eats the Soul&quot; at equal 93rd.  Dont know why the discrepancy but noticed it this morning when going over the results.<br />
Dont know why the discrepancy but thought it worth noting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ryan		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-20120816/#comment-71157</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-107093/#comment-71157</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I feel like Zizek is trolling moviegoers with his list. He practically admits it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like Zizek is trolling moviegoers with his list. He practically admits it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: cirkusfolk		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-20120816/#comment-71158</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cirkusfolk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-107093/#comment-71158</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Whatever u guys. Ok forget Raiders, I just used that as a completely random example, but what about Schindlers List?  U gonna hate on that one too u fucking antisemites?  In fact there isn&#x27;t a single Speilberg film on the list and he&#x27;s considered by many to be the best director of all time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever u guys. Ok forget Raiders, I just used that as a completely random example, but what about Schindlers List?  U gonna hate on that one too u fucking antisemites?  In fact there isn&#x27;t a single Speilberg film on the list and he&#x27;s considered by many to be the best director of all time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lucy		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-20120816/#comment-71159</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-107093/#comment-71159</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#x27;m going to save this list because I haven&#x27;t seen a majority of them! I have to say even though I enjoyed Vertigo my favorite Hitchcock films are definitely Notorious and Rear Window! :-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#x27;m going to save this list because I haven&#x27;t seen a majority of them! I have to say even though I enjoyed Vertigo my favorite Hitchcock films are definitely Notorious and Rear Window! 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: cirkusfolk		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-20120816/#comment-71160</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cirkusfolk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-107093/#comment-71160</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If u say u watch any of these films more often then you watch The Big Lebowski or Raiders of the Lost Ark then youre fucking liar or someone I wouldn&#x27;t want to hang around because I&#x27;d rather quote those films 8 1&#x2F;2 (as if anyone could tell me a quote from that). So if all these films are then better than the two I mentioned, how come I don&#x27;t watch them more?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If u say u watch any of these films more often then you watch The Big Lebowski or Raiders of the Lost Ark then youre fucking liar or someone I wouldn&#x27;t want to hang around because I&#x27;d rather quote those films 8 1&#x2F;2 (as if anyone could tell me a quote from that). So if all these films are then better than the two I mentioned, how come I don&#x27;t watch them more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Neil		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-20120816/#comment-71161</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-107093/#comment-71161</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Best Picture category in the Oscars is a bit of a joke, average films are consistently nominated and occasionally win due to &#034;buzz&#034; or cheesy sentimentality. Also a foreign film cannot be nominated. Would your list contain only American or British films? World cinema has been integral in shaping today&#x27;s visionary directors and I think these Sight and Sound lists try to convey that. 

The lists, however, are almost self consciously &#034;high-brow&#034; and snobbish, created by the votes of those that consider themselves cineasts and would probably look down their collective nose at the Criterion Collection. So while your assertion that the Oscars&#x27; Best Film category should be a barometer for a list like this is absurd, I&#x27;ll admit that the Sight and Sound voters have over indulged the pre 1950s and certain directors they view as &#034;masters&#034;. 

NB: There is a point to be made that bestowing an award such as &#034;Best Film&#034; in the year the film is released is too early. Perhaps this is one reason why the winners are so often simply beneficiary&#x27;s of hype and that judging the continuing merits of a film 10 years later is a better method of evaluation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Best Picture category in the Oscars is a bit of a joke, average films are consistently nominated and occasionally win due to &quot;buzz&quot; or cheesy sentimentality. Also a foreign film cannot be nominated. Would your list contain only American or British films? World cinema has been integral in shaping today&#x27;s visionary directors and I think these Sight and Sound lists try to convey that. </p>
<p>The lists, however, are almost self consciously &quot;high-brow&quot; and snobbish, created by the votes of those that consider themselves cineasts and would probably look down their collective nose at the Criterion Collection. So while your assertion that the Oscars&#x27; Best Film category should be a barometer for a list like this is absurd, I&#x27;ll admit that the Sight and Sound voters have over indulged the pre 1950s and certain directors they view as &quot;masters&quot;. </p>
<p>NB: There is a point to be made that bestowing an award such as &quot;Best Film&quot; in the year the film is released is too early. Perhaps this is one reason why the winners are so often simply beneficiary&#x27;s of hype and that judging the continuing merits of a film 10 years later is a better method of evaluation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-20120816/#comment-71162</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-107093/#comment-71162</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes, we should all just rely on AFI lists because only Americans can make great films...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, we should all just rely on AFI lists because only Americans can make great films&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: TimmaeXVX		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-20120816/#comment-71163</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TimmaeXVX]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-107093/#comment-71163</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For all those bored with seeing the same films on every list I encourage you to check out Mark Kermode&#x27;s. The man put Ken Russel&#x27;s The Devils on there for fuck&#x27;s sake. My favorite list out of about 40 I&#x27;ve seen so far.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all those bored with seeing the same films on every list I encourage you to check out Mark Kermode&#x27;s. The man put Ken Russel&#x27;s The Devils on there for fuck&#x27;s sake. My favorite list out of about 40 I&#x27;ve seen so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: cirkusfolk		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-20120816/#comment-71164</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cirkusfolk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/sight-robert-altman-ridley-scott-more-crack-top-100-107093/#comment-71164</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Personally I think this list is a bunch of hogwash.  Granted I&#x27;ve only seen about 20 films on it, but there&#x27;s way too much Hitchcock love and Casablanca at 85??  I wonder how many of these films are Best Picture winners.  Aren&#x27;t those supposed to be the best films?  Guess not.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I think this list is a bunch of hogwash.  Granted I&#x27;ve only seen about 20 films on it, but there&#x27;s way too much Hitchcock love and Casablanca at 85??  I wonder how many of these films are Best Picture winners.  Aren&#x27;t those supposed to be the best films?  Guess not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
