Using Huck Finn or Jesus is not considered stealing as it is considered satire. This is why Saturday Night Live etc can do satire on real life or fictional characters and not be sued.
Surprised anyone couldn't come up with that on there own.

I thought the League sucked, I don't know of any great work Moore has put out in Decades. (though he is indeed the God of Modern Comics) The movie sucked much worse but I would say if F/X does it, could be interesting. If its on Fox does it, Auto-Suck!!!

"he’s willingly sold the rights to his comic books (he doesn’t like calling them graphic novels) while also claiming that adaptations are “evil.”"

He DID sell the rights to his work to begin with, but was upset by the earlier adaptations and has not only turned down the recognition of a credit, but also – in his words – "at least a few million dollars" after he also turned down the studio's money.

"According to him, stealing characters from well-known literary sources is totally ok, though."

Yeah … you haven't read his work. Yes GENIUSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS, he does use other characters, but he does so to critically engage with said characters and make moral judgements on them i.e. Harker is a possible feminist creation, James Bond is a thug etc. Then again, I don't imagine you read much of anything.

"comic books (he doesn’t like calling them graphic novels)"

Comic books are comic books, graphic novels are graphic novels. They are related, but they are not the same thing and it speaks to your arrogance that you'll attempt to patronize him by showing your ignorance.

Unless you are Walt Disney, obviously.

lol