<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Seth Rogen Proudly Admits He Excavated &#8216;Green Hornet&#8217; To Make The Super Hero Movie He Wanted; Character Be Damned	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/seth-rogen-proudly-admits-he-excavated-20090417/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/seth-rogen-proudly-admits-he-excavated-20090417/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 05:01:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: gabetoro		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/seth-rogen-proudly-admits-he-excavated-20090417/#comment-6380</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gabetoro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 06:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=7813#comment-6380</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Lolita, don&#039;t be dumb.  Rogen didn&#039;t write that movie.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lolita, don&#8217;t be dumb.  Rogen didn&#8217;t write that movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Christopher Lin		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/seth-rogen-proudly-admits-he-excavated-20090417/#comment-6363</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Lin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=7813#comment-6363</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This reminds me of an interview in which Alan Moore criticizes the Wachowski brothers for adapting V for Vendetta in order to explore contemporary American political concerns rather than writing their own story to address these themes.  While I do think there is room for re-interpreting old material to explore new ground, I have to admit that Moore has a point in how there&#039;s a certain creative neglect about doing so.  If Rogen and Goldberg want to deconstruct the hero-sidekick relationship, why not write their own superhero story to better accommodate their creative interests?  The answers come naturally enough -- easier to write, a built-in fan base for a recognizable cultural icon, etc. -- but they don&#039;t justify the decision on an artistic level.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That said, some re-interpretive adaptations DO work, especially when they tease out, amplify, and/or extend latent themes in the original source material.  The Dark Knight and Iron Man are two good recent examples (though admittedly overused -- sorry about that).  The Dark Knight takes questions about vigilantism and the psychological state of Batman and his enemies that were already explored to a significant extent in the comics, and tied them with contemporary worries about terrorism and government response to terrorists to create a story that resonated with the original comic while also addressing today&#039;s political issues.  Iron Man&#039;s original themes of Cold War military industrialism were likewise recast in the light of today&#039;s new understanding of international relations and military conflicts (although the film cops out at the end by focusing on yet another lamely nefarious supervillain with no substantial motive or philosophy).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hopefully Rogen and Goldberg can create just as rich a relationship between their exploration of the hero-sidekick relationship and the original series&#039; themes.  I think that would kick ass, and they&#039;re certainly capable of doing it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Of course, this is all bullshit to some extent, because I know very little about the Green Hornet -- so how would I know if what they did jived with the original series at all?  Which is, I suppose, why they chose to seize that particular property rather than something with a larger and more rabid fan base.  Hopefully I&#039;ll get up to speed before this comes out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of an interview in which Alan Moore criticizes the Wachowski brothers for adapting V for Vendetta in order to explore contemporary American political concerns rather than writing their own story to address these themes.  While I do think there is room for re-interpreting old material to explore new ground, I have to admit that Moore has a point in how there&#8217;s a certain creative neglect about doing so.  If Rogen and Goldberg want to deconstruct the hero-sidekick relationship, why not write their own superhero story to better accommodate their creative interests?  The answers come naturally enough &#8212; easier to write, a built-in fan base for a recognizable cultural icon, etc. &#8212; but they don&#8217;t justify the decision on an artistic level.</p>
<p>That said, some re-interpretive adaptations DO work, especially when they tease out, amplify, and/or extend latent themes in the original source material.  The Dark Knight and Iron Man are two good recent examples (though admittedly overused &#8212; sorry about that).  The Dark Knight takes questions about vigilantism and the psychological state of Batman and his enemies that were already explored to a significant extent in the comics, and tied them with contemporary worries about terrorism and government response to terrorists to create a story that resonated with the original comic while also addressing today&#8217;s political issues.  Iron Man&#8217;s original themes of Cold War military industrialism were likewise recast in the light of today&#8217;s new understanding of international relations and military conflicts (although the film cops out at the end by focusing on yet another lamely nefarious supervillain with no substantial motive or philosophy).</p>
<p>Hopefully Rogen and Goldberg can create just as rich a relationship between their exploration of the hero-sidekick relationship and the original series&#8217; themes.  I think that would kick ass, and they&#8217;re certainly capable of doing it.</p>
<p>Of course, this is all bullshit to some extent, because I know very little about the Green Hornet &#8212; so how would I know if what they did jived with the original series at all?  Which is, I suppose, why they chose to seize that particular property rather than something with a larger and more rabid fan base.  Hopefully I&#8217;ll get up to speed before this comes out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lolita Hazed		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/seth-rogen-proudly-admits-he-excavated-20090417/#comment-6360</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lolita Hazed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 01:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=7813#comment-6360</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m starting to really dislike Seth Rogen. Writing your character&#039;s rape scene is not something I could do so tongue-in-cheek.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m starting to really dislike Seth Rogen. Writing your character&#8217;s rape scene is not something I could do so tongue-in-cheek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
