<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Screenwriter Talks George Miller&#8217;s More Intellectually Ambitious Version Of &#8216;Contact&#8217;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/screenwriter-talks-george-millers-more-intellectually-ambitious-version-of-contact-20160429/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/screenwriter-talks-george-millers-more-intellectually-ambitious-version-of-contact-20160429/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 02:27:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jen		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/screenwriter-talks-george-millers-more-intellectually-ambitious-version-of-contact-20160429/#comment-147735</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2016 16:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2016/more/uncategorized/screenwriter-talks-george-millers-more-intellectually-ambitious-version-of-contact-292038/#comment-147735</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I saw Contact after Interstellar. Interstellar\&#039;s far superior but the faith vs. science argument at the heart of Contact was interesting and worth exploring. Didn\&#039;t like Jodie\&#039;s performance though. She had already entered into her \&#039;clenched teeth\&#039; period of acting. McConaughey was just eye candy but man, was he beautiful. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw Contact after Interstellar. Interstellar\&#8217;s far superior but the faith vs. science argument at the heart of Contact was interesting and worth exploring. Didn\&#8217;t like Jodie\&#8217;s performance though. She had already entered into her \&#8217;clenched teeth\&#8217; period of acting. McConaughey was just eye candy but man, was he beautiful. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: skelderow		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/screenwriter-talks-george-millers-more-intellectually-ambitious-version-of-contact-20160429/#comment-147736</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[skelderow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2016 02:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2016/more/uncategorized/screenwriter-talks-george-millers-more-intellectually-ambitious-version-of-contact-292038/#comment-147736</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[loved the original contact. maybe foster\&#039;s best role. i like miller too, MMfury road was awesome. glad zemeckis got to make his version. on my top ten scifi list. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>loved the original contact. maybe foster\&#8217;s best role. i like miller too, MMfury road was awesome. glad zemeckis got to make his version. on my top ten scifi list. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ROLAND RAT		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/screenwriter-talks-george-millers-more-intellectually-ambitious-version-of-contact-20160429/#comment-147737</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ROLAND RAT]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 17:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2016/more/uncategorized/screenwriter-talks-george-millers-more-intellectually-ambitious-version-of-contact-292038/#comment-147737</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Contact is almost a masterpiece and does a much better job than Interstellar at packaging the big science fiction themes. Sentimentality lets it down though. That\&#039;s what Kevin the Gerbil says anyway.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contact is almost a masterpiece and does a much better job than Interstellar at packaging the big science fiction themes. Sentimentality lets it down though. That\&#8217;s what Kevin the Gerbil says anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: blake		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/screenwriter-talks-george-millers-more-intellectually-ambitious-version-of-contact-20160429/#comment-147738</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 17:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2016/more/uncategorized/screenwriter-talks-george-millers-more-intellectually-ambitious-version-of-contact-292038/#comment-147738</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I loved Contact and aside form the unnecessary love interest I didn\&#039;t find it talked down to the audience. Also Jodie Foster was fantastic in it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved Contact and aside form the unnecessary love interest I didn\&#8217;t find it talked down to the audience. Also Jodie Foster was fantastic in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: bohmer		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/screenwriter-talks-george-millers-more-intellectually-ambitious-version-of-contact-20160429/#comment-147739</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bohmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2016 17:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2016/more/uncategorized/screenwriter-talks-george-millers-more-intellectually-ambitious-version-of-contact-292038/#comment-147739</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[one of the rare case of &#034;i\&#039;m fine with what\&#039;ve got&#034;...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one of the rare case of &quot;i\&#8217;m fine with what\&#8217;ve got&quot;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
