<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Scary Movies 6: &#8216;Maniac&#8217; Remake Is A Perversely Pleasurable Mixture Of Pop Psychology And Slasher Movie Sleaze	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/scary-movies-6-maniac-remake-is-a-perversely-pleasurable-mixture-of-pop-psychology-and-slasher-movie-sleaze-20121029/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/scary-movies-6-maniac-remake-is-a-perversely-pleasurable-mixture-of-pop-psychology-and-slasher-movie-sleaze-20121029/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:17:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: xierdaxinxi		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/scary-movies-6-maniac-remake-is-a-perversely-pleasurable-mixture-of-pop-psychology-and-slasher-movie-sleaze-20121029/#comment-67196</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xierdaxinxi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/scary-movies-6-maniac-remake-is-a-perversely-pleasurable-mixture-of-pop-psychology-and-slasher-movie-sleaze-104757/#comment-67196</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Your article is very persuasive, and I&#x27;m like, I will often come to pay attention to your articles.

water construction]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article is very persuasive, and I&#x27;m like, I will often come to pay attention to your articles.</p>
<p>water construction</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: plainview		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/scary-movies-6-maniac-remake-is-a-perversely-pleasurable-mixture-of-pop-psychology-and-slasher-movie-sleaze-20121029/#comment-67197</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[plainview]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/scary-movies-6-maniac-remake-is-a-perversely-pleasurable-mixture-of-pop-psychology-and-slasher-movie-sleaze-104757/#comment-67197</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Saw this a few weeks ago at the Chicago Film Festival. It was a blast! I&#x27;m a fan of the original, but I really think this is the rare remake that successfully takes the general narrative of the first film and twists it into something different. It feels like its own animal and avoids stepping on the original&#x27;s toes. I too left the theater thinking about what a great double feature it would make if paired up with Drive.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw this a few weeks ago at the Chicago Film Festival. It was a blast! I&#x27;m a fan of the original, but I really think this is the rare remake that successfully takes the general narrative of the first film and twists it into something different. It feels like its own animal and avoids stepping on the original&#x27;s toes. I too left the theater thinking about what a great double feature it would make if paired up with Drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: me		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/scary-movies-6-maniac-remake-is-a-perversely-pleasurable-mixture-of-pop-psychology-and-slasher-movie-sleaze-20121029/#comment-67198</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[me]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/scary-movies-6-maniac-remake-is-a-perversely-pleasurable-mixture-of-pop-psychology-and-slasher-movie-sleaze-104757/#comment-67198</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#034;No, the movie&#x27;s not misogynist and I&#x27;m not a misogynist. I love women! Look at how many of them are naked in my movie!&#034; 
-
uhm...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;No, the movie&#x27;s not misogynist and I&#x27;m not a misogynist. I love women! Look at how many of them are naked in my movie!&quot;<br />
&#8211;<br />
uhm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Archer Slyce		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/scary-movies-6-maniac-remake-is-a-perversely-pleasurable-mixture-of-pop-psychology-and-slasher-movie-sleaze-20121029/#comment-67199</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Archer Slyce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/scary-movies-6-maniac-remake-is-a-perversely-pleasurable-mixture-of-pop-psychology-and-slasher-movie-sleaze-104757/#comment-67199</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Again, with all due respect (?), I call bullshit on your Hill Have Eyes comment. Really. But yeah this one looks kinda interesting, for the cinematography alone. As far as the POV schtick goes: why not. By the way chances are it won&#x27;t be as viral as found-footage and thus will probably always be considered arty for some reason.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, with all due respect (?), I call bullshit on your Hill Have Eyes comment. Really. But yeah this one looks kinda interesting, for the cinematography alone. As far as the POV schtick goes: why not. By the way chances are it won&#x27;t be as viral as found-footage and thus will probably always be considered arty for some reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
