Comments on: Scarlett Johansson Officially Replaces Emily Blunt In ‘Iron Man 2’

By: gabetoro

gabetoro — Sun, 15 Mar 2009 19:09:00 +0000

It really sounds like you have some unresolved issues with Blythe Danner.

By: modpixie

modpixie — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:52:00 +0000

Paltry rarely if ever comes off as anything but some rich blonde WASP who’s slumming it with…whatever the subject of the film is. Plus, she has that nasally voice and upspeaks everything, and she carries on as though she was better than her material. Yes, she was fantastic as the villianess in HARD EIGHT, but that was a long time ago, and anything she had in her that may have come off as interesting has been replaced with an air of entitlement.

(FWIW, I don’t care much for ScarJo, either, but Paltry just pisses me off. There is no film in which she couldn’t have been recast to a much better result.)

By: gabetoro

gabetoro — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:09:00 +0000

Incorrect, modpixie.

By: rodrigoperez

rodrigoperez — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:12:00 +0000

then paltrow? absolutely not.

By: modpixie

modpixie — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:09:00 +0000

As much as Scarlett isn’t such a hot thespian, you have to admit: She’s a far, far better actress than Gwyneth Paltry. I’ve seen fake pointsettia plants with more presence and charisma than Gwynnie.

By: Lolita Hazed

Lolita Hazed — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:15:00 +0000

This was disappointing. I was really excited to see Emily Blunt as the Black Widow.

By: gabetoro

gabetoro — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 02:35:00 +0000

Brutal? BRUTAL? This is a deal that guarantees her work and a nice paycheck in a number of tentpole properties. We’re in a fucking recession- the money Scarlett Johansson gets for any role outside of a high school play is generous. There’s a difference between “below market value” and “brutal” and people like Finke need to get their head out of their asses.