<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Sam Raimi Thinks ‘Spider-Man 3’ Was Awful Too	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sam-raimi-thinks-spider-man-3-was-awful-too-20141231/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sam-raimi-thinks-spider-man-3-was-awful-too-20141231/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 04:37:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Emperor Zerg Rush		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sam-raimi-thinks-spider-man-3-was-awful-too-20141231/#comment-138738</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emperor Zerg Rush]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 04:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/sam-raimi-thinks-spider-man-3-was-awful-too-268786/#comment-138738</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I\&#039;ll always look at it like this - Raimi\&#039;s first Spider-Man is Raimi getting re-acquainted with the type of narrative driven story he hadn\&#039;t necessarily been filming in recent years. It has uneven moments, punctuated by some performances that just don\&#039;t bring it to the level it should be at. Is it entertaining? Yes. It is unassailably great? No. Spider-Man 2, however, is Raimi back in that narrative niche - it delivers on all fronts and is a wholly satisfying story from start to finish. Spider-Man 3 is just a damn train wreck. It splits attentions in too many directions at once, which rips a sense of focus away from its audience (who the hell are we supposed to root for? the tragic villain Sandman? Harry? Pete? Aunt May\&#039;s frock salesman?) and it suffers so much for it. No comic book film needs villains that occupy half the fingers on a single hand (and Sony/Marvel are deluding themselves in thinking Sinister Six is going to be a success).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I\&#8217;ll always look at it like this &#8211; Raimi\&#8217;s first Spider-Man is Raimi getting re-acquainted with the type of narrative driven story he hadn\&#8217;t necessarily been filming in recent years. It has uneven moments, punctuated by some performances that just don\&#8217;t bring it to the level it should be at. Is it entertaining? Yes. It is unassailably great? No. Spider-Man 2, however, is Raimi back in that narrative niche &#8211; it delivers on all fronts and is a wholly satisfying story from start to finish. Spider-Man 3 is just a damn train wreck. It splits attentions in too many directions at once, which rips a sense of focus away from its audience (who the hell are we supposed to root for? the tragic villain Sandman? Harry? Pete? Aunt May\&#8217;s frock salesman?) and it suffers so much for it. No comic book film needs villains that occupy half the fingers on a single hand (and Sony/Marvel are deluding themselves in thinking Sinister Six is going to be a success).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Christian		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/sam-raimi-thinks-spider-man-3-was-awful-too-20141231/#comment-138739</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 04:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/sam-raimi-thinks-spider-man-3-was-awful-too-268786/#comment-138739</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Raimi is the man and utterly underrated. Spidey 1 &#038; 2 are comic book movie masterpieces.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raimi is the man and utterly underrated. Spidey 1 &amp; 2 are comic book movie masterpieces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
