<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Rumor: Legendary Pictures’ 2016 Event Move Is Marvel’s ‘Namor: The Sub-Mariner’	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/rumor-legendary-pictures-2016-event-move-is-marvels-namor-the-sub-mariner-20140516/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/rumor-legendary-pictures-2016-event-move-is-marvels-namor-the-sub-mariner-20140516/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:28:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jack		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/rumor-legendary-pictures-2016-event-move-is-marvels-namor-the-sub-mariner-20140516/#comment-32214</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/rumor-legendary-pictures-2016-event-move-is-marvels-namor-the-sub-mariner-85779/#comment-32214</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#034;Every company is chasing the Marvel model, hot to trot for that âAvengersâ $1 billy. Sony Pictures is so hot for it they seem to be destroying their âSpider-Manâ franchise in the process, not able to keep their eye on a story for a second because they are world-building towards future installments instead. D.C and Warner Bros. seem to be doing the same. They appear to be rushing towards a âJustice Leagueâ movie rather than laying the proper groundwork. Everyone wants to be and do what Marvel has done badly. Every boss is asking their exec, âWhereâs our Marvel movie?â

Translation: &#034;Me Likey Marvel, All others Baad&#034;

I have to laugh at the laying the groundwork part, Marvel rushed Avengers out the gate at the same rate WB &#038; Sony are, they tossed in needless elements into Iron Man 2, Thor and Cap to set-up The Avengers in just 3 years and it hurt those movies. &#034;Captain America WWII Hero&#034; was reduced to a 2-minute montage and quick death to force him to the future for Avengers rather then proper development.

&#034;Well, Universal has one character and one shot. Namor is both a super hero and a super villain, so imagining him as a morally complex character? They canât leverage anything Marvel outside of the Namor world, but maybe they can reimagine the character a little bit and make him a stand-alone project? Whether you think itâll work or not is not the question.&#034;

Shyeah because movie-making requires other franchise and cinematic universe fads to work, it&#x27;s not like there&#x27;s more than a hundred years worth of self-contained stories in movie history or anything.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Every company is chasing the Marvel model, hot to trot for that âAvengersâ $1 billy. Sony Pictures is so hot for it they seem to be destroying their âSpider-Manâ franchise in the process, not able to keep their eye on a story for a second because they are world-building towards future installments instead. D.C and Warner Bros. seem to be doing the same. They appear to be rushing towards a âJustice Leagueâ movie rather than laying the proper groundwork. Everyone wants to be and do what Marvel has done badly. Every boss is asking their exec, âWhereâs our Marvel movie?â</p>
<p>Translation: &quot;Me Likey Marvel, All others Baad&quot;</p>
<p>I have to laugh at the laying the groundwork part, Marvel rushed Avengers out the gate at the same rate WB &amp; Sony are, they tossed in needless elements into Iron Man 2, Thor and Cap to set-up The Avengers in just 3 years and it hurt those movies. &quot;Captain America WWII Hero&quot; was reduced to a 2-minute montage and quick death to force him to the future for Avengers rather then proper development.</p>
<p>&quot;Well, Universal has one character and one shot. Namor is both a super hero and a super villain, so imagining him as a morally complex character? They canât leverage anything Marvel outside of the Namor world, but maybe they can reimagine the character a little bit and make him a stand-alone project? Whether you think itâll work or not is not the question.&quot;</p>
<p>Shyeah because movie-making requires other franchise and cinematic universe fads to work, it&#x27;s not like there&#x27;s more than a hundred years worth of self-contained stories in movie history or anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brad		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/rumor-legendary-pictures-2016-event-move-is-marvels-namor-the-sub-mariner-20140516/#comment-32215</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/rumor-legendary-pictures-2016-event-move-is-marvels-namor-the-sub-mariner-85779/#comment-32215</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#034;we live in a world where evidently it must be either confirmation or denial and even then, assumptions that denials are lies if they donât fit the narrative&#034;

True. We also live in a world where Latino-Review posted that Cumberbatch had been cast as Khan ... despite later denials from Abrams and Bad Robot. The Playlist&#x27;s response? &#034;So, remember when the Internet was convinced that KHAAAAAAAAAN would be the villain in &#034;Star Trek 2&#034; because Benicio Del Toro was intially (sic.) tapped to play the role, and then Edgar Ramirez and Jordi Molla were being tossed around to replace him after he bounced? Well, guess again.&#034; 

GOOD WORK GUYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYS]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;we live in a world where evidently it must be either confirmation or denial and even then, assumptions that denials are lies if they donât fit the narrative&quot;</p>
<p>True. We also live in a world where Latino-Review posted that Cumberbatch had been cast as Khan &#8230; despite later denials from Abrams and Bad Robot. The Playlist&#x27;s response? &quot;So, remember when the Internet was convinced that KHAAAAAAAAAN would be the villain in &quot;Star Trek 2&quot; because Benicio Del Toro was intially (sic.) tapped to play the role, and then Edgar Ramirez and Jordi Molla were being tossed around to replace him after he bounced? Well, guess again.&quot; </p>
<p>GOOD WORK GUYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marko		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/rumor-legendary-pictures-2016-event-move-is-marvels-namor-the-sub-mariner-20140516/#comment-32216</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marko]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/rumor-legendary-pictures-2016-event-move-is-marvels-namor-the-sub-mariner-85779/#comment-32216</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Uhm Pacific Rim was a complete failure.  Haven&#x27;t you read the other articles on this site?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhm Pacific Rim was a complete failure.  Haven&#x27;t you read the other articles on this site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
