<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Rumor: Fox To Move Ahead With &#8216;Fantastic Four 2&#8217;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/rumor-fox-to-move-ahead-with-fantastic-four-2-20150811/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/rumor-fox-to-move-ahead-with-fantastic-four-2-20150811/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 02:41:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Skippy		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/rumor-fox-to-move-ahead-with-fantastic-four-2-20150811/#comment-127025</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skippy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 02:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2015/more/uncategorized/rumor-fox-to-move-ahead-with-fantastic-four-2-260962/#comment-127025</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes, and I remember WB insisting that they were absolutely going ahead with Green Lantern 2.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, and I remember WB insisting that they were absolutely going ahead with Green Lantern 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/rumor-fox-to-move-ahead-with-fantastic-four-2-20150811/#comment-127026</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 02:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2015/more/uncategorized/rumor-fox-to-move-ahead-with-fantastic-four-2-260962/#comment-127026</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sure they are. Just like Sony was going to move forward with Sinister Six, etc. after TASM 2 underwhelmed. Fox is just posturing. Also, I love how people say FF is too valuable for Fox to let go. It\&#039;s not very valuable. The previous 2 films did ok at the box office....this one flopped. It\&#039;s not like they are sitting on Harry Potter or The Hunger Games here.  Marvel could do a good job with FF but this property doesn\&#039;t sell itself.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure they are. Just like Sony was going to move forward with Sinister Six, etc. after TASM 2 underwhelmed. Fox is just posturing. Also, I love how people say FF is too valuable for Fox to let go. It\&#8217;s not very valuable. The previous 2 films did ok at the box office&#8230;.this one flopped. It\&#8217;s not like they are sitting on Harry Potter or The Hunger Games here.  Marvel could do a good job with FF but this property doesn\&#8217;t sell itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: EpicJeff		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/rumor-fox-to-move-ahead-with-fantastic-four-2-20150811/#comment-127027</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EpicJeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 02:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2015/more/uncategorized/rumor-fox-to-move-ahead-with-fantastic-four-2-260962/#comment-127027</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think what would annoy me most about this if they did go forward with another movie is how notorious Fox is for canceling TV shows at the drop of a hat like Firefly and Family Guy (although they did bring Family Guy back, but that\&#039;s beside the point).  This movie bombs big time but they still want a sequel?  Meh...bring back Firefly to TV.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what would annoy me most about this if they did go forward with another movie is how notorious Fox is for canceling TV shows at the drop of a hat like Firefly and Family Guy (although they did bring Family Guy back, but that\&#8217;s beside the point).  This movie bombs big time but they still want a sequel?  Meh&#8230;bring back Firefly to TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Emperor Zerg Rush		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/rumor-fox-to-move-ahead-with-fantastic-four-2-20150811/#comment-127028</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emperor Zerg Rush]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 02:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2015/more/uncategorized/rumor-fox-to-move-ahead-with-fantastic-four-2-260962/#comment-127028</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Backing out now would be admitting defeat and showing weakness despite the positive PR rushes/etc. that they pumped into this thing. I wouldn\&#039;t be too surprised if they wait until the debris clears and then find a way to get out of going ahead with it (assuming they still do at all).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Backing out now would be admitting defeat and showing weakness despite the positive PR rushes/etc. that they pumped into this thing. I wouldn\&#8217;t be too surprised if they wait until the debris clears and then find a way to get out of going ahead with it (assuming they still do at all).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jr		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/rumor-fox-to-move-ahead-with-fantastic-four-2-20150811/#comment-127029</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 02:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2015/more/uncategorized/rumor-fox-to-move-ahead-with-fantastic-four-2-260962/#comment-127029</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I read the quote at HitFix. Sounds like they\&#039;re just BS\&#039;ing to be honest. They are not exactly a lightning rod for exclusives.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the quote at HitFix. Sounds like they\&#8217;re just BS\&#8217;ing to be honest. They are not exactly a lightning rod for exclusives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
