Comments on: Review: ‘Wrath Of The Titans’ A Barely Memorable, Lifeless Sequel

By: KC

KC — Sun, 22 May 2016 04:16:26 +0000

I dare you to accept the concept that movies don't need a great story to be memorable. People watch movies to be entertained, and for the vast majority of people out there, characters and storytelling aren't the only considerations for entertainent value. You're telling me there isn't a single CG generated moment in the Titan series that didn't impress you? And by the way, if you're going to put yourself on an intellectual pedestal, at least take the time to spell Kronos correctly. I would've also accepted Cronus.

By: Nik Grape

Nik Grape — Sun, 22 May 2016 04:16:26 +0000

Hey what's with the Danny Huston jabs! Guy's awesome, leave him be. And we all knew the story in Wrath.. was gonna be shite, to put it mildly. It's all about the visuals in this one and the trailers, I gotta say, are selling them pretty well. Looks like a braindead spectacle at the movies, but a spectacle none-the-less.

By: pisstalker

pisstalker — Sun, 22 May 2016 04:16:26 +0000

remember Gabe Toro like Ghost Rider 2, just saying.

By: GB

GB — Sun, 22 May 2016 04:16:26 +0000

I just attended the gala opening of this film today and I'm already struggling to remember what the barely-existent plot about. Thank goodness tickets were free!

By: Wash

Wash — Sun, 22 May 2016 04:16:26 +0000

I always love when sequels are reviewed by people who either hated, didn't watch or can't remember the original. Makes you feel pretty secure in their assessment of the film. And you can't pull that "every film should stand on its own argument" because Playlist gave decent reviews to the split Harry Potters, Twilights and Lord of the Rings.

By: KT

KT — Sun, 22 May 2016 04:16:26 +0000

Gabe, you may have outdone yourself this time; this review is full of quotables.