<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Review: &#8216;Thor&#8217; Is Overstuffed, But Still A (Mostly) Pleasant, Consistently Entertaining Surprise	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-thor-is-overstuffed-but-still-a-mostly-pleasant-consistently-entertaining-surprise-20110505/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-thor-is-overstuffed-but-still-a-mostly-pleasant-consistently-entertaining-surprise-20110505/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 14:37:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mr Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-thor-is-overstuffed-but-still-a-mostly-pleasant-consistently-entertaining-surprise-20110505/#comment-98375</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 14:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/review-thor-is-overstuffed-but-still-a-mostly-pleasant-consistently-entertaining-surprise-118809/#comment-98375</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Saw it. Very impressed, good good film. Nothing to be disappointed about at all. Hit all the right buttons. See it! 

If Captain America and Green Lanter suck, at least Thor got it right (mostly!).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw it. Very impressed, good good film. Nothing to be disappointed about at all. Hit all the right buttons. See it! </p>
<p>If Captain America and Green Lanter suck, at least Thor got it right (mostly!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zoe		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-thor-is-overstuffed-but-still-a-mostly-pleasant-consistently-entertaining-surprise-20110505/#comment-98376</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zoe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 14:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/review-thor-is-overstuffed-but-still-a-mostly-pleasant-consistently-entertaining-surprise-118809/#comment-98376</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A note on the 3D.  Apparently a lot of the Asgardian action scenes were specially shot for 3D but the cinematography in New Mexico was done in and for 2D.  I saw Thor in 3D and really liked the effect that that gave: kind of like the Wizard of Oz switching between B&amp;W and colour depending on setting.

As for the film, I agree with you that none of the actors had much to do, but they all did it pretty well.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A note on the 3D.  Apparently a lot of the Asgardian action scenes were specially shot for 3D but the cinematography in New Mexico was done in and for 2D.  I saw Thor in 3D and really liked the effect that that gave: kind of like the Wizard of Oz switching between B&#038;W and colour depending on setting.</p>
<p>As for the film, I agree with you that none of the actors had much to do, but they all did it pretty well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ryan		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-thor-is-overstuffed-but-still-a-mostly-pleasant-consistently-entertaining-surprise-20110505/#comment-98377</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 14:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/review-thor-is-overstuffed-but-still-a-mostly-pleasant-consistently-entertaining-surprise-118809/#comment-98377</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Everyone\&#039;s entitled to his or her opinion, but I take slight issue with Kenneth Branagh\&#039;s legacy being cast as a director of \&quot;(mostly not particularly good) Shakespeare adaptations.\&quot; His four hour adaptation of \&quot;Hamlet\&quot; is amazing. He shot the film on 65mm, so it\&#039;s worth checking out just for that. 

He was Oscar-nominated for directing his first Shakespeare film \&quot;Henry V\&quot;, \&quot;Much Ado About Nothing\&quot; is 90% on Rotten Tomatoes, \&quot;Love\&#039;s Labour\&#039;s Lost\&quot; was apparently pretty bad, but \&quot;As You Like It\&quot; scored a 75 on metacritic.

Branagh\&#039;s definitely going to go down in history as \&quot;that guy who was obsessed with Shakespeare\&quot;, but I don\&#039;t think he did too bad by the bard, after all.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone\&#8217;s entitled to his or her opinion, but I take slight issue with Kenneth Branagh\&#8217;s legacy being cast as a director of \&#8221;(mostly not particularly good) Shakespeare adaptations.\&#8221; His four hour adaptation of \&#8221;Hamlet\&#8221; is amazing. He shot the film on 65mm, so it\&#8217;s worth checking out just for that. </p>
<p>He was Oscar-nominated for directing his first Shakespeare film \&#8221;Henry V\&#8221;, \&#8221;Much Ado About Nothing\&#8221; is 90% on Rotten Tomatoes, \&#8221;Love\&#8217;s Labour\&#8217;s Lost\&#8221; was apparently pretty bad, but \&#8221;As You Like It\&#8221; scored a 75 on metacritic.</p>
<p>Branagh\&#8217;s definitely going to go down in history as \&#8221;that guy who was obsessed with Shakespeare\&#8221;, but I don\&#8217;t think he did too bad by the bard, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brody		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-thor-is-overstuffed-but-still-a-mostly-pleasant-consistently-entertaining-surprise-20110505/#comment-98378</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brody]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 14:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/review-thor-is-overstuffed-but-still-a-mostly-pleasant-consistently-entertaining-surprise-118809/#comment-98378</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[jd, you\&#039;re talking about a cast of \&quot;Norse gods\&quot; who spent decades monologuing in mock Shakespearean, alliterated English, as they pranced across rainbow bridges between dimensions and adventured with horse-faced aliens.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jd, you\&#8217;re talking about a cast of \&#8221;Norse gods\&#8221; who spent decades monologuing in mock Shakespearean, alliterated English, as they pranced across rainbow bridges between dimensions and adventured with horse-faced aliens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jd		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-thor-is-overstuffed-but-still-a-mostly-pleasant-consistently-entertaining-surprise-20110505/#comment-98379</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 14:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/review-thor-is-overstuffed-but-still-a-mostly-pleasant-consistently-entertaining-surprise-118809/#comment-98379</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Y\&#039;know, I\&#039;m not a racist, and it\&#039;s hardly racist to be puzzled by the news that a black man was being cast as a Norse, i.e. Viking god.  I\&#039;m sure a lot of Japanese would be mildly agitated if Blake Lively was going to play Ameratsu.

Or, look at it this way: would Africans and African-Americans have a right to disagree if Brad Pitt was going to play Papa Legba, and Angelina Jolie play Anansie?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Y\&#8217;know, I\&#8217;m not a racist, and it\&#8217;s hardly racist to be puzzled by the news that a black man was being cast as a Norse, i.e. Viking god.  I\&#8217;m sure a lot of Japanese would be mildly agitated if Blake Lively was going to play Ameratsu.</p>
<p>Or, look at it this way: would Africans and African-Americans have a right to disagree if Brad Pitt was going to play Papa Legba, and Angelina Jolie play Anansie?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: daniel		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-thor-is-overstuffed-but-still-a-mostly-pleasant-consistently-entertaining-surprise-20110505/#comment-98380</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 14:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/review-thor-is-overstuffed-but-still-a-mostly-pleasant-consistently-entertaining-surprise-118809/#comment-98380</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[\&quot;The biggest change in the comic book movie in the last twenty-odd years...[is that]  “Steel,” “The Phantom” and “Batman and Robin” may have been both unsuccessful, and nearly unwatchable, but they were at least rooted in their pulp origins...\&quot;

I suspect this view is the very reason you end up with terrible comic book films like those listed here.  All of these films were made from the point of view that comics are essentially silly, poorly written and ridiculous, and the filmmakers wrap that commentary into the execution (and then, in these cases execute THAT poorly).  Comics and comic films have been wrestling with this problem since the campy 60\&#039;s batman show.  These are comic films made by people who don\&#039;t like comics very much.

As bad as many early comics were, it wasn\&#039;t there intention to be bad; they weren\&#039;t being drawn with a sense of self-commentary, they were being drawn to be as entertaining as possible to their audience.   They were made to be cool, not to be an ironic commentary on the fact that the audience has no taste.

By the same standard, I could say Miller\&#039;s Crossing was a bad example of  a gangster film, because it didn\&#039;t have all the overwrought, stagey acting of The Glass Key.  Or Star Wars is a failed sci fi film, because you can\&#039;t see any strings holding up the spaceships.

There are plenty of examples of self-conscious jokes, or meta commentary in old comics (Dick Tracy for instance), but they were intentionally written that way.   And what\&#039;s more, I see nothing wrong with making a joke out of our nostalgiac view of things (Galaxy Quest with Star Trek fans).  But that is parody of the genre, which is only an aspect of the genre itself.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>\&#8221;The biggest change in the comic book movie in the last twenty-odd years&#8230;[is that]  “Steel,” “The Phantom” and “Batman and Robin” may have been both unsuccessful, and nearly unwatchable, but they were at least rooted in their pulp origins&#8230;\&#8221;</p>
<p>I suspect this view is the very reason you end up with terrible comic book films like those listed here.  All of these films were made from the point of view that comics are essentially silly, poorly written and ridiculous, and the filmmakers wrap that commentary into the execution (and then, in these cases execute THAT poorly).  Comics and comic films have been wrestling with this problem since the campy 60\&#8217;s batman show.  These are comic films made by people who don\&#8217;t like comics very much.</p>
<p>As bad as many early comics were, it wasn\&#8217;t there intention to be bad; they weren\&#8217;t being drawn with a sense of self-commentary, they were being drawn to be as entertaining as possible to their audience.   They were made to be cool, not to be an ironic commentary on the fact that the audience has no taste.</p>
<p>By the same standard, I could say Miller\&#8217;s Crossing was a bad example of  a gangster film, because it didn\&#8217;t have all the overwrought, stagey acting of The Glass Key.  Or Star Wars is a failed sci fi film, because you can\&#8217;t see any strings holding up the spaceships.</p>
<p>There are plenty of examples of self-conscious jokes, or meta commentary in old comics (Dick Tracy for instance), but they were intentionally written that way.   And what\&#8217;s more, I see nothing wrong with making a joke out of our nostalgiac view of things (Galaxy Quest with Star Trek fans).  But that is parody of the genre, which is only an aspect of the genre itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: BuntyHoven		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-thor-is-overstuffed-but-still-a-mostly-pleasant-consistently-entertaining-surprise-20110505/#comment-98381</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BuntyHoven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 14:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/review-thor-is-overstuffed-but-still-a-mostly-pleasant-consistently-entertaining-surprise-118809/#comment-98381</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nice review. Hope it\&#039;s good. Summer\&#039;s looking a bit sparse.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review. Hope it\&#8217;s good. Summer\&#8217;s looking a bit sparse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jebus		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-thor-is-overstuffed-but-still-a-mostly-pleasant-consistently-entertaining-surprise-20110505/#comment-98382</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jebus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 14:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/review-thor-is-overstuffed-but-still-a-mostly-pleasant-consistently-entertaining-surprise-118809/#comment-98382</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[First couple paragraphs summarized: I have not read a comic ever, or at least since 1985.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First couple paragraphs summarized: I have not read a comic ever, or at least since 1985.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
