Comments on: Review: The Wachowskis’ ‘Jupiter Ascending’ Starring Channing Tatum, Mila Kunis & Eddie Redmayne

By: Emperor Zerg Rush

Emperor Zerg Rush — Mon, 23 May 2016 04:17:02 +0000

It seems we\’ve all lost focus of the most important thing here and that\’s how obscenely ridiculous Channing Tatum looks in this film. It\’s like a Middle Earth elf crossbred with one of those racing jockeys from the Saddlesore Galactica episode of The Simpsons.

By: MARCUS

MARCUS — Mon, 23 May 2016 04:17:02 +0000

Your review is as facile and warmed over as you accuse the film of being. Pauline Kael would be turning in her grave right now. Back to the basement and your x-box, where this review belongs.

By: KundaliniRising

KundaliniRising — Mon, 23 May 2016 04:17:02 +0000

They\’ve been brothers for their entire lives, you think just because one of them wants to be a woman now that the other still doesn\’t think of him as a brother? If you had a brother for over 40 years, but then he got a sex change, in your mind would he not always be your brother? Andy probably occasionally thinks of him as Larry still, regardless of what gender he looks like or wants to be. So please consider this when complaining that the writer of this article still refers to them as the Wachowski Brothers. Seems like an honest error and not a lack of respect.

By: Gary

Gary — Mon, 23 May 2016 04:17:02 +0000

Rating is too generous. Movie is risible trash of a sub-Phantom Menace level.

By: Nuno

Nuno — Mon, 23 May 2016 04:17:02 +0000

I find it funny a critic accusing an author of arrogance 🙂

By: mr.t

mr.t — Mon, 23 May 2016 04:17:02 +0000

as a sci-fi/fantasy popcorn movie, it\’s bound to have silly conceits like the one mentioned in the first paragraph. i don\’t mind them. what i want to know is if the movie is any fun. Star Wars is full of bs but it\’s still a fun movie. i hope this one is to as i\’m always down for some space opera. the fact that this site gave Interstellar a D rating, i believe it was, i\’ll choose to ignore this review and judge for myself.

By: The Playlist ed.

The Playlist ed. — Mon, 23 May 2016 04:17:02 +0000

It was correct to begin with, an editor overstep their bounds and introduced the error. We regret the mistake.

By: Murphys Law

Murphys Law — Mon, 23 May 2016 04:17:02 +0000

You gave this a similar rating to Interstellar. Unbelievable.

By: Arran

Arran — Mon, 23 May 2016 04:17:02 +0000

We should respect that they don\’t identify as brothers any more. Otherwise a great read.

By: reggie

reggie — Mon, 23 May 2016 04:17:02 +0000

Ahh, looks like you\’ve corrected it!

By: Reggie

Reggie — Mon, 23 May 2016 04:17:02 +0000

Mr. Jagernauth, you may not have liked the movie but the least you could do was respect the fact that the Wachowski BROTHERS are now the Wachowski SIBLINGS.

By: cary

cary — Mon, 23 May 2016 04:17:02 +0000

it\’s Samuel Barnett, not Arnett

By: benbadone

benbadone — Mon, 23 May 2016 04:17:01 +0000

The "Critics" ruined this movie before anyone went to see it for themselves. I loved it and was enthralled with all of the sci-fi creatures and technology. I especially loved the concept that the aliens were harvesting the essence of humans to extend their lives for thousands of years. See the movie for yourself and don\’t let the critics decide what\’s worthy for you to see.

By: John

John — Mon, 23 May 2016 04:17:01 +0000

wasn\’t fantastic but there was another great sequence in the action setpiece that takes places at dawn and sprawls across downtown chicago. yes, the city looks pretty vacant, but it\’s beautiful, well-executed, and it is a "dawn" so the city probably isn\’t bumping too much at 5-6am… I wasn\’t so harsh on it being "quiet". this was a miss. but it\’s not as terrible as it is being made out to be. perhaps we just hold the wachowski\’s bar higher than usual?

By: Andy

Andy — Mon, 23 May 2016 04:17:01 +0000

@Reggie: No, they\’re still the Wachowski BROTHERS. They just won\’t admit it. Extract and clone "Lana\’s" DNA–and you\’d get LARRY.