<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Review: &#8216;The Day&#8217; Presents Post-Apocalypse From The A La Carte Menu	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-the-day-presents-post-apocalypse-from-the-a-la-carte-menu-20120828/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-the-day-presents-post-apocalypse-from-the-a-la-carte-menu-20120828/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:40:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: R		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-the-day-presents-post-apocalypse-from-the-a-la-carte-menu-20120828/#comment-70319</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[R]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/review-the-day-presents-post-apocalypse-from-the-a-la-carte-menu-106657/#comment-70319</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In &#034;The day&#034;, there are moving pictures of landscapes, people, and things happening. Because indeed, as the reviewer has guessed, it&#x27;s a movie. Besides, it&#x27;s quite a genre movie, what the reviewer has also realized - meaning, as it happens, that more-or-less codified, hence predictable situations arise. This is probably the most stupid and useless movie critic I&#x27;ve ever read. Why account for something you&#x27;re not interested in?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In &quot;The day&quot;, there are moving pictures of landscapes, people, and things happening. Because indeed, as the reviewer has guessed, it&#x27;s a movie. Besides, it&#x27;s quite a genre movie, what the reviewer has also realized &#8211; meaning, as it happens, that more-or-less codified, hence predictable situations arise. This is probably the most stupid and useless movie critic I&#x27;ve ever read. Why account for something you&#x27;re not interested in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
