<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Review: &#8216;Piranha 3DD&#8217; Dutifully Fails To Be In On The Joke	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-piranha-3dd-dutifully-fails-to-be-in-on-the-joke-20120531/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-piranha-3dd-dutifully-fails-to-be-in-on-the-joke-20120531/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:22:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: meh review		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-piranha-3dd-dutifully-fails-to-be-in-on-the-joke-20120531/#comment-77258</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[meh review]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/review-piranha-3dd-dutifully-fails-to-be-in-on-the-joke-110092/#comment-77258</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Meh film, Meh review. i understan why this writer and the movie gets the hate.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh film, Meh review. i understan why this writer and the movie gets the hate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MENTD		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-piranha-3dd-dutifully-fails-to-be-in-on-the-joke-20120531/#comment-77259</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MENTD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/review-piranha-3dd-dutifully-fails-to-be-in-on-the-joke-110092/#comment-77259</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[He seems to have misinterpretted this material as comedy?
Are you kidding? Seriously? A movie named &#034;Piranha 3 DOUBLE D&#034; and you think it&#x27;s serious?
Neither of the remake versions were anything but comedies - even the fish are rendered
in Pixar cartoonish nonseriousness.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He seems to have misinterpretted this material as comedy?<br />
Are you kidding? Seriously? A movie named &quot;Piranha 3 DOUBLE D&quot; and you think it&#x27;s serious?<br />
Neither of the remake versions were anything but comedies &#8211; even the fish are rendered<br />
in Pixar cartoonish nonseriousness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: A-Man		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-piranha-3dd-dutifully-fails-to-be-in-on-the-joke-20120531/#comment-77260</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A-Man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/review-piranha-3dd-dutifully-fails-to-be-in-on-the-joke-110092/#comment-77260</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#034;He literally reviewed the movie, therefore he is a reviewer.&#034;

Second-ed!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;He literally reviewed the movie, therefore he is a reviewer.&quot;</p>
<p>Second-ed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arch		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-piranha-3dd-dutifully-fails-to-be-in-on-the-joke-20120531/#comment-77261</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/review-piranha-3dd-dutifully-fails-to-be-in-on-the-joke-110092/#comment-77261</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hold on a sec. The review makes sense to me according to what I&#x27;ve seen&#x2F;read. Now, to look back at Aja&#x27;s (dibs on the n word) film as some kind of ironic gem ... com&#x27;on. The punchline &#x27;Saving Private Ryan for the Jersey Shore generation&#x27; is damn fine though, but I&#x27;ll focus on the Jersey shore part. Sometimes tongue in cheek is just dumb trying to look smart (and Aja did it with Hills have eyes) .]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hold on a sec. The review makes sense to me according to what I&#x27;ve seen&#x2F;read. Now, to look back at Aja&#x27;s (dibs on the n word) film as some kind of ironic gem &#8230; com&#x27;on. The punchline &#x27;Saving Private Ryan for the Jersey Shore generation&#x27; is damn fine though, but I&#x27;ll focus on the Jersey shore part. Sometimes tongue in cheek is just dumb trying to look smart (and Aja did it with Hills have eyes) .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Judas Maplestick		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-piranha-3dd-dutifully-fails-to-be-in-on-the-joke-20120531/#comment-77262</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Judas Maplestick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/review-piranha-3dd-dutifully-fails-to-be-in-on-the-joke-110092/#comment-77262</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I would take this review seriously except for that fact the self-proclaimed &#034;reviewer&#034; kept refering to this cheesy b-movie as &#034;the picture.&#034; It&#x27;s 2012, we haven&#x27;t called them pictures for 50 years or so.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would take this review seriously except for that fact the self-proclaimed &quot;reviewer&quot; kept refering to this cheesy b-movie as &quot;the picture.&quot; It&#x27;s 2012, we haven&#x27;t called them pictures for 50 years or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
