"But the casual stitching together of largely circumstantial evidence in order to propose a not-quite-halfway-plausible alternate theory to the killings never really comes together. Had Monaghan chosen to truly investigate these claims, putting the family narrative aside, he might have found a way to present this proposal in a clear headed way that asked serious questions about how the entire case was handled. But 'My Brother' isn't that movie. Instead it seems happy enough to play in the sandbox of possibility, coupled with the high of being attached to a celebrity crime story, without ever really taking seriously what effect the posits it throws around has on the victims, their families or the accused."

I guess it depends on the family. I found this documentary to be pretty brave, and presented enough proof to warrant discussion. This was their story about their brother. I appreciate them not trying to sell anything to hard core. It's pretty clear when they're presenting their opinion, and when they're recounting the past. A-