<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Review: &#8216;Men In Black 3&#8217; Is A Surprisingly Decent Return To Form For The Flagging Franchise	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-men-in-black-3-is-a-surprisingly-decent-return-to-form-for-the-flagging-franchise-20120522/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-men-in-black-3-is-a-surprisingly-decent-return-to-form-for-the-flagging-franchise-20120522/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:59:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Aqualadd		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-men-in-black-3-is-a-surprisingly-decent-return-to-form-for-the-flagging-franchise-20120522/#comment-117744</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aqualadd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/review-men-in-black-3-is-a-surprisingly-decent-return-to-form-for-the-flagging-franchise-251917/#comment-117744</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Guys, I donât know where else to go with this. It started out as a joke, and it got big.  Too big.  FAST.  Let me explain while I still have time:

I saw Men in Black 3 at midnight.  It was enjoyable, but I couldnât help my mind from wandering.  I started thinking about Tommy Lee Jones and Josh Brolin, and the joke that Josh Brolin is basically exactly a young version of TLJ.  Then I started thinking about another movie where both actors serve as the protagonist, but are never on the screen at the same time: No Country for Old Men.  Then I started thinking about how maybe the ending of No Country would make more sense if you applied this same idea.  Josh Brolin is just a younger version of TLJ.  Think about the ending.  Josh Brolin goes into a big showoff, the climax of the film; it fades out.  Who do we follow in?  Tommy Lee Jones.  Josh Brolin is dead, but Tommy Lee Jones follows his path.  WHAT IF THEY WERE DIFFERENT VERSIONS OF THE SAME CHARACTER THE WHOLE TIME.  WHAT IF EVERYTHING ELUSIVE ABOUT NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN IS MADE CLEAR THROUGH MEN IN BLACK 3.

Sure.  Laugh it off.  Thatâs what I did. Then: Enter Michael Stuhlbarg. 
Heâs an alien who sees different versions of the future at all times.  Who knows if the whole movie is just one potential version of the future, as interpreted by him?  Think about it.  A Serious Man.  Heâs the star of this Coen Brothers film, and most theories see the film as some realization of his imagination, his life falling apart, and a great deal of the film as partially imagined through the eyes of his character.  WHAT IF MEN IN BLACK 3 IS CONFIRMING A SERIOUS MAN AS THE IMAGINED FUTURE OF ITS PROTAGONIST.

I know.  Itâs silly.  Coincidence.  I sure thought so as the film came to its conclusion and the credits rolled.  But then, everything changed when the name of the screenwriter flashed on screen.  Everything got real. The coincidences could no longer be avoided. 

Screenwriter:
Etan Cohen.

WHAT IF YOU MOVED THE H FROM THE THIRD LETTER IN âCOHENâ TO THE THIRD LETTER IN âETANâ.  Weâre all busy, so let me make this simple for you: you get âEthan Coenâ.

Yeah.  Thatâs right.  Ethan Coen. Brother of Joel Coen.  OF THE COEN BROTHERS.  The third letter in the name.  The third Men in Black film.  Yeah.
 

There are stories of coincidence and chance, of intersections and strange things told, and which is which and who only knows? And we generally say, &#034;Well, if that was in a movie, I wouldn&#x27;t believe it.&#034; Someone&#x27;s so-and-so met someone else&#x27;s so-and-so and so on. And it is in the humble opinion of this narrator that strange things happen all the time.

Until I checked the official Men in Black film twitter account.  2 days ago.  âBarry Sonnenfeld and the Coen brothers at Apple store SOHO!â  And a picture to boot for those who still donât believe. What was the director of this film doing meeting with the Coen Brothers as press for this new film?  Oh, theyâre just friends from way back when Barry Sonnenfeld served as Director of Photography on such films as Millerâs Crossing, Raising Arizona, and Blood Simple. 

Iâm not saying Barry Sonnenfeld called up the Coen Brothers and said, âHey brothers, you wanna write the third Men in Black for me and use it to explain all the confusing endings of your films in a secret conspiratorial way?â and Iâm not saying they responded âSure, but can we do it under the silly pen name of âEtan Cohenâ just like our other silly pen name âRoderick Jaynesâ!â 

Actually, thatâs exactly what Iâm saying.

You have to help me bust this open before the powerful Coen Lobby shuts it down.  Get this out everywhere.  Tell everyone you know.  Get it trending on twitter.  We must stop the terrible #CoenConspiracy.  And we must stop it now.

Thanks for reading!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys, I donât know where else to go with this. It started out as a joke, and it got big.  Too big.  FAST.  Let me explain while I still have time:</p>
<p>I saw Men in Black 3 at midnight.  It was enjoyable, but I couldnât help my mind from wandering.  I started thinking about Tommy Lee Jones and Josh Brolin, and the joke that Josh Brolin is basically exactly a young version of TLJ.  Then I started thinking about another movie where both actors serve as the protagonist, but are never on the screen at the same time: No Country for Old Men.  Then I started thinking about how maybe the ending of No Country would make more sense if you applied this same idea.  Josh Brolin is just a younger version of TLJ.  Think about the ending.  Josh Brolin goes into a big showoff, the climax of the film; it fades out.  Who do we follow in?  Tommy Lee Jones.  Josh Brolin is dead, but Tommy Lee Jones follows his path.  WHAT IF THEY WERE DIFFERENT VERSIONS OF THE SAME CHARACTER THE WHOLE TIME.  WHAT IF EVERYTHING ELUSIVE ABOUT NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN IS MADE CLEAR THROUGH MEN IN BLACK 3.</p>
<p>Sure.  Laugh it off.  Thatâs what I did. Then: Enter Michael Stuhlbarg.<br />
Heâs an alien who sees different versions of the future at all times.  Who knows if the whole movie is just one potential version of the future, as interpreted by him?  Think about it.  A Serious Man.  Heâs the star of this Coen Brothers film, and most theories see the film as some realization of his imagination, his life falling apart, and a great deal of the film as partially imagined through the eyes of his character.  WHAT IF MEN IN BLACK 3 IS CONFIRMING A SERIOUS MAN AS THE IMAGINED FUTURE OF ITS PROTAGONIST.</p>
<p>I know.  Itâs silly.  Coincidence.  I sure thought so as the film came to its conclusion and the credits rolled.  But then, everything changed when the name of the screenwriter flashed on screen.  Everything got real. The coincidences could no longer be avoided. </p>
<p>Screenwriter:<br />
Etan Cohen.</p>
<p>WHAT IF YOU MOVED THE H FROM THE THIRD LETTER IN âCOHENâ TO THE THIRD LETTER IN âETANâ.  Weâre all busy, so let me make this simple for you: you get âEthan Coenâ.</p>
<p>Yeah.  Thatâs right.  Ethan Coen. Brother of Joel Coen.  OF THE COEN BROTHERS.  The third letter in the name.  The third Men in Black film.  Yeah.</p>
<p>There are stories of coincidence and chance, of intersections and strange things told, and which is which and who only knows? And we generally say, &quot;Well, if that was in a movie, I wouldn&#x27;t believe it.&quot; Someone&#x27;s so-and-so met someone else&#x27;s so-and-so and so on. And it is in the humble opinion of this narrator that strange things happen all the time.</p>
<p>Until I checked the official Men in Black film twitter account.  2 days ago.  âBarry Sonnenfeld and the Coen brothers at Apple store SOHO!â  And a picture to boot for those who still donât believe. What was the director of this film doing meeting with the Coen Brothers as press for this new film?  Oh, theyâre just friends from way back when Barry Sonnenfeld served as Director of Photography on such films as Millerâs Crossing, Raising Arizona, and Blood Simple. </p>
<p>Iâm not saying Barry Sonnenfeld called up the Coen Brothers and said, âHey brothers, you wanna write the third Men in Black for me and use it to explain all the confusing endings of your films in a secret conspiratorial way?â and Iâm not saying they responded âSure, but can we do it under the silly pen name of âEtan Cohenâ just like our other silly pen name âRoderick Jaynesâ!â </p>
<p>Actually, thatâs exactly what Iâm saying.</p>
<p>You have to help me bust this open before the powerful Coen Lobby shuts it down.  Get this out everywhere.  Tell everyone you know.  Get it trending on twitter.  We must stop the terrible #CoenConspiracy.  And we must stop it now.</p>
<p>Thanks for reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: nNark		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-men-in-black-3-is-a-surprisingly-decent-return-to-form-for-the-flagging-franchise-20120522/#comment-117745</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nNark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/review-men-in-black-3-is-a-surprisingly-decent-return-to-form-for-the-flagging-franchise-251917/#comment-117745</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It wasn&#x27;t shot in 3-D - it was converted. A reviewer should know that! But, having just seen it, I can say, the conversion is as good as that of The Avengers and Titanic 3-D. SOME companies, at least, have figured out how it&#x27;s done, and it is done right!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wasn&#x27;t shot in 3-D &#8211; it was converted. A reviewer should know that! But, having just seen it, I can say, the conversion is as good as that of The Avengers and Titanic 3-D. SOME companies, at least, have figured out how it&#x27;s done, and it is done right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nicholas Vargo		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-men-in-black-3-is-a-surprisingly-decent-return-to-form-for-the-flagging-franchise-20120522/#comment-117746</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicholas Vargo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/review-men-in-black-3-is-a-surprisingly-decent-return-to-form-for-the-flagging-franchise-251917/#comment-117746</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Loved your review! I agreed with most of it except for two things. One, I think Michael Stuhlbarg&#x27;s performance is the best thing about the movie, and two, the 3D was obviously up-converted, so I actually say avoid the 3D like the plague unless you live near a Cinemark (where they are the only theater I know that projects their 3D picture bright). Beyond that, I agreed with all of the other kind words you had to say about the new Men in Black. It is a big step up from 2 and I don&#x27;t care what anyone else says.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved your review! I agreed with most of it except for two things. One, I think Michael Stuhlbarg&#x27;s performance is the best thing about the movie, and two, the 3D was obviously up-converted, so I actually say avoid the 3D like the plague unless you live near a Cinemark (where they are the only theater I know that projects their 3D picture bright). Beyond that, I agreed with all of the other kind words you had to say about the new Men in Black. It is a big step up from 2 and I don&#x27;t care what anyone else says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gabe Toro		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-men-in-black-3-is-a-surprisingly-decent-return-to-form-for-the-flagging-franchise-20120522/#comment-117747</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gabe Toro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/review-men-in-black-3-is-a-surprisingly-decent-return-to-form-for-the-flagging-franchise-251917/#comment-117747</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Drew, this movie was awful.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drew, this movie was awful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: cmc		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-men-in-black-3-is-a-surprisingly-decent-return-to-form-for-the-flagging-franchise-20120522/#comment-117748</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cmc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/review-men-in-black-3-is-a-surprisingly-decent-return-to-form-for-the-flagging-franchise-251917/#comment-117748</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good review, but just for the record, it&#x27;s Jemaine Clement. No &#x27;r&#x27;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good review, but just for the record, it&#x27;s Jemaine Clement. No &#x27;r&#x27;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nigel Floyd		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-men-in-black-3-is-a-surprisingly-decent-return-to-form-for-the-flagging-franchise-20120522/#comment-117749</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nigel Floyd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/review-men-in-black-3-is-a-surprisingly-decent-return-to-form-for-the-flagging-franchise-251917/#comment-117749</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[At the screening I attended, one person laughed, once. Yes, it&#x27;s better than MIB2, but stabbing yourself in the eyes with red hot needles is better than MIB2. The time-travel device is contrived, the plotting is laboured, the tone is smug and there are no jokes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the screening I attended, one person laughed, once. Yes, it&#x27;s better than MIB2, but stabbing yourself in the eyes with red hot needles is better than MIB2. The time-travel device is contrived, the plotting is laboured, the tone is smug and there are no jokes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mr Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-men-in-black-3-is-a-surprisingly-decent-return-to-form-for-the-flagging-franchise-20120522/#comment-117750</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/review-men-in-black-3-is-a-surprisingly-decent-return-to-form-for-the-flagging-franchise-251917/#comment-117750</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Personally i think some critics are being harsh on this movie just for the sake of it, but it really IS better than MIB2 and it&#x27;s pretty decent summer blockbuster movie and not at all bad, despite the hoohaa over how long it took to make. Deserves that B grade.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally i think some critics are being harsh on this movie just for the sake of it, but it really IS better than MIB2 and it&#x27;s pretty decent summer blockbuster movie and not at all bad, despite the hoohaa over how long it took to make. Deserves that B grade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Pierre		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-men-in-black-3-is-a-surprisingly-decent-return-to-form-for-the-flagging-franchise-20120522/#comment-117751</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pierre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/review-men-in-black-3-is-a-surprisingly-decent-return-to-form-for-the-flagging-franchise-251917/#comment-117751</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Roll on, Summer blockbuster season, you old friend.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roll on, Summer blockbuster season, you old friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-men-in-black-3-is-a-surprisingly-decent-return-to-form-for-the-flagging-franchise-20120522/#comment-117752</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/review-men-in-black-3-is-a-surprisingly-decent-return-to-form-for-the-flagging-franchise-251917/#comment-117752</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#034;His impression was no doubt cultivated during the production of &#034;No Country for Old Men.&#034;&#034; Why? They didn&#x27;t share any scenes, remember?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;His impression was no doubt cultivated during the production of &quot;No Country for Old Men.&quot;&quot; Why? They didn&#x27;t share any scenes, remember?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: THANK GOD GABE DID NOT REVIEW THIS FILM		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-men-in-black-3-is-a-surprisingly-decent-return-to-form-for-the-flagging-franchise-20120522/#comment-117753</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[THANK GOD GABE DID NOT REVIEW THIS FILM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/review-men-in-black-3-is-a-surprisingly-decent-return-to-form-for-the-flagging-franchise-251917/#comment-117753</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[nice!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
