<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Review: &#8216;Fading Gigolo&#8217; Starring John Turturro &#038; Woody Allen Is Breezy And Inoffensive	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-fading-gigolo-starring-john-turturro-woody-allen-is-breezy-and-inoffensive-20140415/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-fading-gigolo-starring-john-turturro-woody-allen-is-breezy-and-inoffensive-20140415/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:43:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: David Fuchs		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-fading-gigolo-starring-john-turturro-woody-allen-is-breezy-and-inoffensive-20140415/#comment-34338</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Fuchs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/review-fading-gigolo-starring-john-turturro-woody-allen-is-breezy-and-inoffensive-87077/#comment-34338</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The film was made bf Team-Farrow started the lynching. I wonder how much damage was done (eg, did it stop Stone &#038; Vergara from promoting? Are the reviews subconsciously influenced by the &#034;offensive criminal&#034;?).

Most people say that Woody must be guilty of sexual behavior bc Vanity Fair reported that he was in counseling for that. VF said that it was an &#034;Undeniable Fact&#034; that Justice Wilk  said &#034;Dylan must be protected&#034; from sexual behavior.

How far can a rag, such as VF, go?! I don&#x27;t ask for much, my threshold is low. I don&#x27;t ask that they write what IS true, only what can POSSIBLY be true!! 

The counselor testified that it was NOT  sexual, how can she POSSIBLY counsel Woody for sexual behavior???

Wilk said that &#034;she must be protected&#034; from NONsexual inappropriate behavior. Wilk cited testimony from the counselor, Allen himself, Yale--all &#034;nonsexual.&#034;

Wilk &#038; both appellate courts said that EVEN SATCHEL must be protected from the man who is destroying the life of Soon-Yi. They were all proven wrong!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The film was made bf Team-Farrow started the lynching. I wonder how much damage was done (eg, did it stop Stone &amp; Vergara from promoting? Are the reviews subconsciously influenced by the &quot;offensive criminal&quot;?).</p>
<p>Most people say that Woody must be guilty of sexual behavior bc Vanity Fair reported that he was in counseling for that. VF said that it was an &quot;Undeniable Fact&quot; that Justice Wilk  said &quot;Dylan must be protected&quot; from sexual behavior.</p>
<p>How far can a rag, such as VF, go?! I don&#x27;t ask for much, my threshold is low. I don&#x27;t ask that they write what IS true, only what can POSSIBLY be true!! </p>
<p>The counselor testified that it was NOT  sexual, how can she POSSIBLY counsel Woody for sexual behavior???</p>
<p>Wilk said that &quot;she must be protected&quot; from NONsexual inappropriate behavior. Wilk cited testimony from the counselor, Allen himself, Yale&#8211;all &quot;nonsexual.&quot;</p>
<p>Wilk &amp; both appellate courts said that EVEN SATCHEL must be protected from the man who is destroying the life of Soon-Yi. They were all proven wrong!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
