Comments on: Review: ‘Dinner for Schmucks’ Is Only Almost As Painful As It Looks https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-dinner-for-schmucks-is-only-20100729/ Sat, 14 Nov 2020 01:00:20 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 By: Anonymous https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-dinner-for-schmucks-is-only-20100729/#comment-21761 Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:01:18 +0000 http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=1891#comment-21761 yeah, fool on the hill is awful. fuck off cirkuscunt.

]]> By: kimbermyers https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-dinner-for-schmucks-is-only-20100729/#comment-21728 Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:46:19 +0000 http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=1891#comment-21728 That would explain why they used it twice.

]]> By: kevinjagernauth https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-dinner-for-schmucks-is-only-20100729/#comment-21711 Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:34:12 +0000 http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=1891#comment-21711 Yes, it's actual version. Apparently it cost them $1.5 million to secure the rights.

]]> By: cirkusfolk https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-dinner-for-schmucks-is-only-20100729/#comment-21707 Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:05:36 +0000 http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=1891#comment-21707 Is it the actual Beatles version of the Fool on the Hill? That's funny because that song always felt long to me anyway…not one of my favorites.

]]>