<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Review: &#8216;Child 44&#8217; Starring Tom Hardy, Noomi Rapace, Gary Oldman And Joel Kinnaman	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-child-44-starring-tom-hardy-noomi-rapace-gary-oldman-and-joel-kinnaman-20150416/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-child-44-starring-tom-hardy-noomi-rapace-gary-oldman-and-joel-kinnaman-20150416/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 03:41:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Andrea		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-child-44-starring-tom-hardy-noomi-rapace-gary-oldman-and-joel-kinnaman-20150416/#comment-132944</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrea]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 03:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2015/more/uncategorized/review-child-44-starring-tom-hardy-noomi-rapace-gary-oldman-and-joel-kinnaman-265017/#comment-132944</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Having read the novel and then seen the film today I can honestly say the film was a let down.   It\&#039;s not a bad film and I did enjoy it but it didn\&#039;t portray the tensions, emotions and background that made this a best selling novel.  There were bits of the story missed out and I felt it was all a bit rushed to cram it in to the two hours.    It could have been so much more ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having read the novel and then seen the film today I can honestly say the film was a let down.   It\&#8217;s not a bad film and I did enjoy it but it didn\&#8217;t portray the tensions, emotions and background that made this a best selling novel.  There were bits of the story missed out and I felt it was all a bit rushed to cram it in to the two hours.    It could have been so much more </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jh		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-child-44-starring-tom-hardy-noomi-rapace-gary-oldman-and-joel-kinnaman-20150416/#comment-132945</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 03:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2015/more/uncategorized/review-child-44-starring-tom-hardy-noomi-rapace-gary-oldman-and-joel-kinnaman-265017/#comment-132945</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Having read the source novel, I can tell you that the identity of the killer is a surprise twist that makes sense of the entire narrative. It\&#039;s a revelation that ties the whole story together. And having read Price\&#039;s early draft, I can also tell you that it was (at least at one point) the same as in the novel. I can see why they\&#039;d ultimately trim it, in that it requires yet another sub-plot in a story that is (quite novelistically, and uncinematically, as you point out) already full of them - but THAT one? The story\&#039;s a whodunit. Why would you trim out THAT one? Very confusing.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having read the source novel, I can tell you that the identity of the killer is a surprise twist that makes sense of the entire narrative. It\&#8217;s a revelation that ties the whole story together. And having read Price\&#8217;s early draft, I can also tell you that it was (at least at one point) the same as in the novel. I can see why they\&#8217;d ultimately trim it, in that it requires yet another sub-plot in a story that is (quite novelistically, and uncinematically, as you point out) already full of them &#8211; but THAT one? The story\&#8217;s a whodunit. Why would you trim out THAT one? Very confusing.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
