<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Review: &#8216;Cars 2&#8217; Features All New Parts, But With Less Than Pleasing Results	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-cars-2-features-all-new-parts-but-with-less-than-pleasing-results-20110621/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-cars-2-features-all-new-parts-but-with-less-than-pleasing-results-20110621/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 14:20:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Caleb		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-cars-2-features-all-new-parts-but-with-less-than-pleasing-results-20110621/#comment-94722</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caleb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 14:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/review-cars-2-features-all-new-parts-but-with-less-than-pleasing-results-117937/#comment-94722</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The original Cars definitely didn\&#039;t underperform at the box office. It made truckloads of money in both ticket sales and merchandise. Sadly the far superior Ratatouille had a very disappointing debut (by Pixar standards) one year later.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original Cars definitely didn\&#8217;t underperform at the box office. It made truckloads of money in both ticket sales and merchandise. Sadly the far superior Ratatouille had a very disappointing debut (by Pixar standards) one year later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: goldfarb		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-cars-2-features-all-new-parts-but-with-less-than-pleasing-results-20110621/#comment-94723</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[goldfarb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 14:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/review-cars-2-features-all-new-parts-but-with-less-than-pleasing-results-117937/#comment-94723</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I liked Cars better when it was Doc Hollywood...
as for Cars 2, I will remember it as the first Pixar film that I have no interest in seeing at all...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked Cars better when it was Doc Hollywood&#8230;<br />
as for Cars 2, I will remember it as the first Pixar film that I have no interest in seeing at all&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DanielF23		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/review-cars-2-features-all-new-parts-but-with-less-than-pleasing-results-20110621/#comment-94724</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DanielF23]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 14:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/review-cars-2-features-all-new-parts-but-with-less-than-pleasing-results-117937/#comment-94724</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Haters gonna hate.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haters gonna hate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
