So this seems to be the explanation for the film being "misogynist" (the correct word is "misogynistic"):"Kidman\’s character is constantly abused, tortured, and harassed, both physically and psychologically. She never fights back and rarely even protests". Now this statement is blatantly untrue. She is not terribly efficient – no one without memory would be, either man or woman – but she is actively searching for solutions, she does not allow herself to be constantly abused psychologically (in fact, the moment she realises she is being abused, she fights back) or physically (there are three cases of physical abuse, in all cases she is taken by surprise and immediately fights back or calls for help, in one case she physically defeats the abuser – not an easy thing for a woman to achieve in a man-to-woman struggle). And she or the authors of the film do not for a moment even hint at the possibility that abuse should be acceptable because she had an affair.

"The Paperboy" and "Grace of Monaco" both got an F on this site, while "Stoker" got a D. And apparently you found "The Railway Man" worth of an F-rating as well. Yikes, Kidman must be the actress with the worst track on this site?