<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8216;Repo Chick&#8217; Trailer: What The Hell Happened To Alex Cox?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/repo-chick-trailer-what-hell-happened-20100126/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/repo-chick-trailer-what-hell-happened-20100126/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:01:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/repo-chick-trailer-what-hell-happened-20100126/#comment-25157</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 01:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=4905#comment-25157</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Feel sorry for Alex Cox... always a shame to see a director with such a promising start to his career find himself failing at almost every venture in the latter 30 years of his career. His talent was very much a product of 80s cinema when movies were less about technology (in terms of style, look, cinematography and effects) and more about good old fashioned story telling with strong character actors. In those days you could get away with the majority of your shots being locked off and shooting everything in masters with medium and close-up pick-ups... Alas, the simplistic style adopted by Cox&#039;s film-making techniques remain in the early to mid 1980&#039;s and thus so did he... Cox would argue that his downfall was due to finance and the &#039;lack of&#039; but the truth is that he is a mediocre film maker at best. He has a handful of complete bloopers to his credits from the 1990&#039;s onwards and other failed ventures such as efforts to re-vitalize Liverpool&#039;s non existent film industry proved once again that your name and status can only get you so far... and now he struggles to make student films in Colorado by begging for funding for low-budget features online...  Word of advice Cox... use your name as an executive producer to secure funding but leave the film making to the hungry and talented young story tellers who are up to the challenge in 2013... still, Sid and Nancy is a good film for what it&#039;s worth.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feel sorry for Alex Cox&#8230; always a shame to see a director with such a promising start to his career find himself failing at almost every venture in the latter 30 years of his career. His talent was very much a product of 80s cinema when movies were less about technology (in terms of style, look, cinematography and effects) and more about good old fashioned story telling with strong character actors. In those days you could get away with the majority of your shots being locked off and shooting everything in masters with medium and close-up pick-ups&#8230; Alas, the simplistic style adopted by Cox&#39;s film-making techniques remain in the early to mid 1980&#39;s and thus so did he&#8230; Cox would argue that his downfall was due to finance and the &#39;lack of&#39; but the truth is that he is a mediocre film maker at best. He has a handful of complete bloopers to his credits from the 1990&#39;s onwards and other failed ventures such as efforts to re-vitalize Liverpool&#39;s non existent film industry proved once again that your name and status can only get you so far&#8230; and now he struggles to make student films in Colorado by begging for funding for low-budget features online&#8230;  Word of advice Cox&#8230; use your name as an executive producer to secure funding but leave the film making to the hungry and talented young story tellers who are up to the challenge in 2013&#8230; still, Sid and Nancy is a good film for what it&#39;s worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/repo-chick-trailer-what-hell-happened-20100126/#comment-17970</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=4905#comment-17970</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I saw this in Bradford and it is really rather good. The trailer does it a real disservice, even i thought it was going to be bad, but i imagine this too will gain the cult status it thoroughly deserves.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this in Bradford and it is really rather good. The trailer does it a real disservice, even i thought it was going to be bad, but i imagine this too will gain the cult status it thoroughly deserves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: tommy		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/repo-chick-trailer-what-hell-happened-20100126/#comment-15652</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tommy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=4905#comment-15652</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Any film which promotes an anti-golf agenda is alright in my book.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any film which promotes an anti-golf agenda is alright in my book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
