<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Rachel McAdams Still Unsure If She&#8217;s Returning To &#8216;Sherlock Holmes 2&#8217;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/rachel-mcadams-still-unsure-if-shes-returning-to-sherlock-holmes-2-20101110/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/rachel-mcadams-still-unsure-if-shes-returning-to-sherlock-holmes-2-20101110/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2020 14:00:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: BradZuhl		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/rachel-mcadams-still-unsure-if-shes-returning-to-sherlock-holmes-2-20101110/#comment-108823</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BradZuhl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 15:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2010/more/uncategorized/rachel-mcadams-still-unsure-if-shes-returning-to-sherlock-holmes-2-121836/#comment-108823</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It\&#039;s not as if she\&#039;ll be missed. The first movies success was all about the chemistry of Downey and Law, and that\&#039;s what\&#039;s going to draw people to the sequel, not Rachel.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It\&#8217;s not as if she\&#8217;ll be missed. The first movies success was all about the chemistry of Downey and Law, and that\&#8217;s what\&#8217;s going to draw people to the sequel, not Rachel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Castor		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/rachel-mcadams-still-unsure-if-shes-returning-to-sherlock-holmes-2-20101110/#comment-108824</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Castor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 15:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2010/more/uncategorized/rachel-mcadams-still-unsure-if-shes-returning-to-sherlock-holmes-2-121836/#comment-108824</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It doesn\&#039;t matter anyway, she was completely wasted in the first movie.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn\&#8217;t matter anyway, she was completely wasted in the first movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rodie		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/rachel-mcadams-still-unsure-if-shes-returning-to-sherlock-holmes-2-20101110/#comment-108825</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rodie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 15:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2010/more/uncategorized/rachel-mcadams-still-unsure-if-shes-returning-to-sherlock-holmes-2-121836/#comment-108825</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hmmm, it must be a cameo at best if she\&#039;s still unsure at this point. Might it be a \&quot;tag\&quot; at the end of the film, some teaser to lead into part 3 that she\&#039;s trying to keep under wraps?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, it must be a cameo at best if she\&#8217;s still unsure at this point. Might it be a \&#8221;tag\&#8221; at the end of the film, some teaser to lead into part 3 that she\&#8217;s trying to keep under wraps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
