<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: R-Rated &#8216;Weird Science&#8217; Remake In The Works, &#8216;Project X&#8217; &#038; &#8216;Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World&#8217; Writer Michael Bacall To Pen Script	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/r-rated-weird-science-remake-in-the-works-project-x-scott-pilgrim-vs-the-world-writer-michael-bacall-to-pen-script-20130418/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/r-rated-weird-science-remake-in-the-works-project-x-scott-pilgrim-vs-the-world-writer-michael-bacall-to-pen-script-20130418/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:09:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Robbie		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/r-rated-weird-science-remake-in-the-works-project-x-scott-pilgrim-vs-the-world-writer-michael-bacall-to-pen-script-20130418/#comment-57201</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robbie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/r-rated-weird-science-remake-in-the-works-project-x-scott-pilgrim-vs-the-world-writer-michael-bacall-to-pen-script-99260/#comment-57201</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You know, when i said I wanted more adult content I meant I wanted more talking and grown up situations not more boobs. If I wanna see boobs i have the internet. A great part of Wierd Sciences appeal was it&#x27;s geeky playful nature, not to mention John Hughes&#x27;es awsomeness. terrible idea that&#x27;ll I&#x27;m gonna have to pass on.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, when i said I wanted more adult content I meant I wanted more talking and grown up situations not more boobs. If I wanna see boobs i have the internet. A great part of Wierd Sciences appeal was it&#x27;s geeky playful nature, not to mention John Hughes&#x27;es awsomeness. terrible idea that&#x27;ll I&#x27;m gonna have to pass on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: A		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/r-rated-weird-science-remake-in-the-works-project-x-scott-pilgrim-vs-the-world-writer-michael-bacall-to-pen-script-20130418/#comment-57202</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/r-rated-weird-science-remake-in-the-works-project-x-scott-pilgrim-vs-the-world-writer-michael-bacall-to-pen-script-99260/#comment-57202</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear God why?! Hollywood should just start punching us in the face from now on.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear God why?! Hollywood should just start punching us in the face from now on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Memory		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/r-rated-weird-science-remake-in-the-works-project-x-scott-pilgrim-vs-the-world-writer-michael-bacall-to-pen-script-20130418/#comment-57203</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Memory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/r-rated-weird-science-remake-in-the-works-project-x-scott-pilgrim-vs-the-world-writer-michael-bacall-to-pen-script-99260/#comment-57203</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Correct Bacall&#x27;s name in the headline]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct Bacall&#x27;s name in the headline</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: skierpete		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/r-rated-weird-science-remake-in-the-works-project-x-scott-pilgrim-vs-the-world-writer-michael-bacall-to-pen-script-20130418/#comment-57204</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[skierpete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/r-rated-weird-science-remake-in-the-works-project-x-scott-pilgrim-vs-the-world-writer-michael-bacall-to-pen-script-99260/#comment-57204</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was a teenager when wierd science came out, and thought it was an OK, not great movie. This went along with the general trend of the eighties of using science&#x2F;magic to help teens get laid. 

My remake opinion is that you should remake all the mediocre movies you want, so I am fine with the idea. The idea of a Hard-R remake is fine...but what I find funny about all these recent R-rated comedies is how little nudity&#x2F;sex is in any of them. A remake of Weird Science should have nudity and sex in it. Not saying sex between the geeks and the created fantasy woman, but sex none-the-less. 

Either way, only 20 % chance this even happens.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was a teenager when wierd science came out, and thought it was an OK, not great movie. This went along with the general trend of the eighties of using science&#x2F;magic to help teens get laid. </p>
<p>My remake opinion is that you should remake all the mediocre movies you want, so I am fine with the idea. The idea of a Hard-R remake is fine&#8230;but what I find funny about all these recent R-rated comedies is how little nudity&#x2F;sex is in any of them. A remake of Weird Science should have nudity and sex in it. Not saying sex between the geeks and the created fantasy woman, but sex none-the-less. </p>
<p>Either way, only 20 % chance this even happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
